2003 directive allows some deployments without parliamentary oversight, but critics say it doesn’t apply in Ukraine case
A silhouette of a military observer in front of a map of Ukraine | Image: Korea Pro, Canva, edited by Korea Pro
South Korea’s proposal to send an observation team to Ukraine has sparked a heated debate, raising questions about the country’s legal and procedural limits for deploying military personnel abroad.
Defense minister Kim Yong-hyun argued on Monday that sending a small, unarmed team to monitor the Ukraine conflict is lawful under the Directive on Overseas Deployment Operations of the Republic of Korea Armed Forces. However, opposition voices have challenged this view, maintaining these plans run counter to the language of the law and historical precedent.
South Korea’s proposal to send an observation team to Ukraine has sparked a heated debate, raising questions about the country’s legal and procedural limits for deploying military personnel abroad.
Defense minister Kim Yong-hyun argued on Monday that sending a small, unarmed team to monitor the Ukraine conflict is lawful under the Directive on Overseas Deployment Operations of the Republic of Korea Armed Forces. However, opposition voices have challenged this view, maintaining these plans run counter to the language of the law and historical precedent.
Get 30 days
of free access to
KoreaPro
Full access to all analysis
The KOREA PRO newsletter, every business day
Daily analysis on the top story of the day
The ability to suggest topics for coverage by our specialist team
Be smart about South Korea
Get full access to expert analysis and opinion.
Start now
No charges during your trial. Cancel anytime. A paid subscription will start after 30 days.
© Korea Risk Group. All rights reserved.
No part of this content may be reproduced, distributed, or used for
commercial purposes without prior written permission from Korea Risk
Group.