Loss will bleaken ROK’s reputation but may incentivize Seoul to work to boost credibility as foreign investment hub
The partial victory of Elliott Investment Management (EIM), an American investment management firm, against the South Korean government at an international tribunal in the Hague may herald a broader shift in the country’s corporate governance and investment climate.
The Permanent Court of Arbitration ruling mandates that South Korea disburse roughly $108.5 million in damages and legal fees to EIM, substantially lower than the firm’s original claim of $770 million. This claim arose following the contentious merger of two Samsung affiliates, Cheil Industries and Samsung C&T, in 2015.
The partial victory of Elliott Investment Management (EIM), an American investment management firm, against the South Korean government at an international tribunal in the Hague may herald a broader shift in the country’s corporate governance and investment climate.
The Permanent Court of Arbitration ruling mandates that South Korea disburse roughly $108.5 million in damages and legal fees to EIM, substantially lower than the firm’s original claim of $770 million. This claim arose following the contentious merger of two Samsung affiliates, Cheil Industries and Samsung C&T, in 2015.
Get 30 days
of free access to
KoreaPro
-
Full access to all analysis
-
The KOREA PRO newsletter, every business day
-
Daily analysis on the top story of the day
-
The ability to suggest topics for coverage by our specialist team
Be smart about South Korea
Get full access to expert analysis and opinion.
Start
now
No charges during your trial. Cancel anytime. A paid subscription will start after 30 days.
© Korea Risk Group. All rights reserved.
No part of this content may be reproduced, distributed, or used for
commercial purposes without prior written permission from Korea Risk
Group.