Constitutional Court orders more concrete post-2030 emission targets, raising challenges for government and industries
South Korea’s Constitutional Court declared key provisions of the Carbon Neutrality Act unconstitutional on Aug. 29 due to inadequate long-term emission reduction targets. The court’s decision, the first of its kind in Asia, criticized the law for not setting specific goals beyond 2030, which it argued fails to meet the government’s constitutional duty to protect citizens, particularly future generations, from the impacts of climate change.
This ruling has significant implications for South Korea’s legislative framework, industries and alignment with global climate standards.
South Korea’s Constitutional Court declared key provisions of the Carbon Neutrality Act unconstitutional on Aug. 29 due to inadequate long-term emission reduction targets. The court’s decision, the first of its kind in Asia, criticized the law for not setting specific goals beyond 2030, which it argued fails to meet the government’s constitutional duty to protect citizens, particularly future generations, from the impacts of climate change.
This ruling has significant implications for South Korea’s legislative framework, industries and alignment with global climate standards.
Get 30 days
of free access to
KoreaPro
-
Full access to all analysis
-
The KOREA PRO newsletter, every business day
-
Daily analysis on the top story of the day
-
The ability to suggest topics for coverage by our specialist team
Be smart about South Korea
Get full access to expert analysis and opinion.
Start
now
No charges during your trial. Cancel anytime. A paid subscription will start after 30 days.
© Korea Risk Group. All rights reserved.
No part of this content may be reproduced, distributed, or used for
commercial purposes without prior written permission from Korea Risk
Group.