{"id":2209037,"date":"2025-04-07T17:53:25","date_gmt":"2025-04-07T08:53:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/?p=2209037"},"modified":"2025-04-07T17:53:25","modified_gmt":"2025-04-07T08:53:25","slug":"south-koreas-top-court-no-military-in-politics-no-presidential-overreach","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2025\/04\/south-koreas-top-court-no-military-in-politics-no-presidential-overreach\/","title":{"rendered":"South Korea\u2019s top court: No military in politics, no presidential overreach"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Constitutional Court\u2019s <\/span>unanimous decision<\/span><\/a> to remove former President Yoon Suk-yeol from office reaffirmed that ultimate authority and responsibility for national security and defense policy rests with elected civilian leaders, not the military, setting a clear legal precedent against presidential overreach.<\/span><\/p>\n

The April 4 ruling not only clarified the limits of executive power but also sent a powerful message about the fundamental principles guiding South Korea\u2019s constitutional order. The decision reflects a broader commitment to uphold constitutional norms amid political crises, reinforcing the rule of law as the foundation of democratic governance.<\/span><\/p>\n

It serves as a landmark ruling that will likely influence future interpretations of executive authority and military involvement in political affairs.<\/span><\/p>\n

LEGAL BASIS FOR IMPEACHMENT<\/b><\/p>\n

The Constitutional Court\u2019s ruling systematically dismantled Yoon and his legal team\u2019s <\/span>arguments<\/span><\/a>, rejecting the justification that alleged Chinese and North Korean threats, along with what he called the \u201copposition party\u2019s anti-national viciousness\u201d that paralyzed state affairs, warranted the emergency declaration. The justices determined that Yoon had violated the Constitution by declaring martial law and deploying military forces for political purposes.<\/span><\/p>\n

The court specifically cited Yoon\u2019s orders to the Army Special Warfare Command to forcibly remove lawmakers from the National Assembly before a legal quorum was reached, and his instruction to deploy troops to the National Election Commission (NEC) to inspect its computer systems.<\/span><\/p>\n

These actions, according to the justices, violated the constitutional principles of civilian oversight and political neutrality of the armed forces.<\/span><\/p>\n

Moreover, the ruling underscored that Yoon\u2019s declaration of martial law did not address a genuine national security crisis but rather sought to suppress political opposition. The court emphasized that the emergency powers invoked were fundamentally incompatible with the constitutional framework, which mandates a clear and present danger to justify such extreme measures.<\/span><\/p>\n

By articulating this principle explicitly, the court set a precedent that the executive branch cannot unilaterally expand its powers without a demonstrable threat to the nation.<\/span><\/p>\n

The court\u2019s thorough examination of the constitutional violations presented a clear narrative: that presidential powers are not absolute, especially when they infringe upon democratic institutions and civilian control. This approach highlighted the importance of constitutional safeguards against potential abuses of executive authority, reinforcing the principle that no leader can circumvent legal frameworks for political gain.<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"

South Korean citizens demonstrate in front of the National Assembly, calling for then-President Yoon Suk-yeol’s impeachment, Dec. 14, 2024 | Image: Korea Pro<\/em><\/p><\/div>\n

EXPERTS PRAISE CLEAR RULING<\/b><\/p>\n

Experts lauded the ruling as a meticulously crafted legal decision aimed at eliminating any potential for misinterpretation or contestation.<\/span><\/p>\n

Cho Jin-man, a professor of political science at Duksung Women\u2019s University, noted that the language and structure of the decision suggest that the justices \u201cmade up their minds\u201d to deliver a firm message not just to the president but to the broader political establishment.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cIt was written with clear resolve,\u201d Cho told <\/span>Korea Pro<\/span><\/i>. \u201cIt was a cold, rational document that intentionally left no space for legal reinterpretation.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Rhee Jong-hoon, a senior consultant at Politics and Business Consulting, agreed, commending the court for balancing sophisticated legal reasoning with language accessible to ordinary citizens.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cThis was a historic decision, and they expressed it in a way that average citizens could easily understand,\u201d Rhee said.<\/span><\/p>\n

The ruling explicitly addressed Yoon\u2019s overreach, stating that he \u201cabandoned his duty to uphold the Constitution and gravely betrayed the trust of the sovereign people of the Republic of Korea.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Rhee emphasized that the court\u2019s thoroughness demonstrated a commitment to constitutional principles \u201cwithout compromising legal standards.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

The decision\u2019s clear articulation of legal reasoning has been <\/span>praised<\/span><\/a> by legal scholars and civil society groups alike. The Korean Association of Law Professors <\/span>called<\/span><\/a> it \u201ca model of clarity and accessibility,\u201d highlighting the court\u2019s effort to explain complex constitutional concepts in a way that ordinary citizens can understand.<\/span><\/p>\n

This decision also serves an educational purpose, emphasizing the importance of judicial independence in upholding democratic norms. By making the ruling clear and accessible, the court ensured that the public could understand the reasoning behind its decision, fostering greater transparency and trust in the judicial process.<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"

Left: Anti-impeachment demonstrators protest in Seoul’s Jongro District, March 15, 2025; Right: Pro-impeachment demonstrators in front of Seoul’s Gwanghwamun Gate, March 10, 2025 | Image: President\u2019s National Legal Defense Team, Democratic Party of Korea<\/a>, edited by Korea Pro<\/em><\/p><\/div>\n

PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE OF THE RULING<\/b><\/p>\n

The clarity and unanimity of the court\u2019s decision have played a key role in garnering public acceptance. A <\/span>Realmeter poll<\/span><\/a> conducted after the verdict showed that 76.9% of South Korean voters expressed willingness to accept the decision, while only 17.4% opposed it.<\/span><\/p>\n

This is notable, given that a day before the court made its decision, a <\/span>National Barometer Survey poll<\/span><\/a> indicated that only 46% of voters trusted the court\u2019s deliberations process while another 46% stated that they did not.<\/span><\/p>\n

Cho noted that the ruling\u2019s clear and unified presentation was crucial for minimizing political turmoil. He pointed out that the unanimous nature of the decision was likely a strategic move to counter skepticism about the judiciary\u2019s neutrality.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cThere\u2019s been a lot of public distrust, with people questioning whether the justices are ideologically divided,\u201d he said.<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"

South Korean troops attempt to enter the National Assembly following then-President Yoon Suk-yeol’s martial law declaration, Dec. 4, 2024 | Images: Lee Jae-myung via Twitter<\/em><\/p><\/div>\n

BROADER IMPACT ON DEMOCRATIC NORMS<\/b><\/p>\n

The court\u2019s ruling draws a definitive line on military intervention in politics, a crucial stance given South Korea\u2019s history with military coups. Rhee of Politics and Business Consulting pointed out that the decision reaffirmed that the military exists solely for national defense, emphasizing that \u201cthe president should not mobilize the military or police in political crises.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

The ruling condemned Yoon\u2019s deployment of military forces to forcibly remove lawmakers from the National Assembly as an obstruction of the legislature\u2019s constitutionally guaranteed powers. The ruling effectively labeled the former president\u2019s actions as a violation of the principle of political neutrality within the ROK Armed Forces.<\/span><\/p>\n

Rhee noted that this decision resonates with South Korea\u2019s collective memory of military suppression, particularly the May 1980 Gwangju Uprising, when the state invoked martial law and unleashed soldiers to target civilians and suppress the country\u2019s budding pro-democracy movement.<\/span><\/p>\n

Cho agreed with Rhee, and described the ruling as yet another reminder that the military must remain apolitical.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cSouth Korea has lived through multiple military coups, and this ruling closes the door on that past,\u201d he said. \u201cYoon has a prosecutorial background. He should have known better. The Constitutional Court\u2019s ruling made sure that future leaders will.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

LESSONS FOR POLITICAL LEADERSHIP<\/b><\/p>\n

The court\u2019s decision goes beyond removing a president; it serves as a broader lesson in the responsibilities of democratic leadership. Cho told <\/span>Korea Pro<\/span><\/i> that the ruling not only preserved the constitutional framework but also reminded political actors of their duty to operate within legal constraints.<\/span><\/p>\n

Notably, the court stated that while it found Yoon\u2019s argument that the National Assembly\u2019s frequent attempts to impeach Cabinet members and prosecutors as an abuse of power that led to national paralysis \u201cworthy of political respect,\u201d the justices added that Yoon was also at fault for failing to respect the legislature, which \u201crepresents the people, as a partner in cooperative governance.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Rhee noted that the Constitutional Court\u2019s ruling implicitly warned political parties against excessive factionalism, urging them to \u201cwork within the constitutional framework to realize checks and balances through constitutionally prescribed remedies.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

By setting a high standard for presidential accountability, the court reaffirmed that\u00a0 regardless of political allegiance or perceived threats, no leader is above the law.<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"

Acting Chief Justice Moon Hyung-bae reads out the Constitutional Court’s verdict on then-President Yoon Suk-yeol’s impeachmen, April 4, 2025 | Image: Constitutional Court of Korea<\/em><\/p><\/div>\n

A CONSTITUTIONAL ANCHOR<\/b><\/p>\n

By clearly reaffirming civilian control over the military and rejecting presidential overreach, the Constitutional Court\u2019s ruling marks a turning point in South Korea\u2019s democratic trajectory. The decision not only addresses a specific instance of executive abuse but also sets a durable precedent that future leaders must respect.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cYoon\u2019s removal, simply put, completes our democratization,\u201d Rhee said. \u201cHe tried to exploit the Constitution\u2019s blind spots, but the court stopped him. This decision will serve as a constitutional anchor for the country\u2019s future.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cIn the end, rulings like this become a kind of civic education,\u201d Cho told <\/span>Korea Pro<\/span><\/i>. \u201cWhen there\u2019s an impeachment or a constitutional crisis, people learn more about how democracy works.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cIt\u2019s not just about removing a president,\u201d he said. \u201cIt\u2019s about reminding lawmakers, voters and the public what democracy requires \u2014 and what the Constitution demands.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Edited by John Lee<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n

Culture & Society<\/span><\/a>Defense & Security<\/span><\/a>Domestic Politics<\/span><\/a><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Constitutional Court\u2019s unanimous decision to remove former President Yoon Suk-yeol from office reaffirmed that ultimate authority and responsibility for national security and defense policy rests with elected civilian leaders, not the military, setting a clear legal precedent against presidential overreach. The April 4 ruling not only clarified the limits of executive power but also […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10909,"featured_media":2209038,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[25,26,27],"class_list":["post-2209037","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-analysis","tag-culture-society","tag-defense-security","tag-domestic-politics"],"yoast_head":"\nSouth Korea\u2019s top court: No military in politics, no presidential overreach - Korea Pro<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2025\/04\/south-koreas-top-court-no-military-in-politics-no-presidential-overreach\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"South Korea\u2019s top court: No military in politics, no presidential overreach - Korea Pro\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Constitutional Court\u2019s unanimous decision to remove former President Yoon Suk-yeol from office reaffirmed that ultimate authority and responsibility for national security and defense policy rests with elected civilian leaders, not the military, setting a clear legal precedent against presidential overreach. The April 4 ruling not only clarified the limits of executive power but also […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2025\/04\/south-koreas-top-court-no-military-in-politics-no-presidential-overreach\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Korea Pro\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/nknewsorg\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-04-07T08:53:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/assets.korearisk.com\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2025\/04\/1-2.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1870\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"joonha.park\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@southkoreapro\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@southkoreapro\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Joon Ha Park\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2025\/04\/south-koreas-top-court-no-military-in-politics-no-presidential-overreach\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2025\/04\/south-koreas-top-court-no-military-in-politics-no-presidential-overreach\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"joonha.park\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/#\/schema\/person\/cc3b1d808ab580085098711a059f751d\"},\"headline\":\"South Korea\u2019s top court: No military in politics, no presidential overreach\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-04-07T08:53:25+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-04-07T08:53:25+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2025\/04\/south-koreas-top-court-no-military-in-politics-no-presidential-overreach\/\"},\"wordCount\":1480,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2025\/04\/south-koreas-top-court-no-military-in-politics-no-presidential-overreach\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/assets.korearisk.com\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2025\/04\/1-2.png\",\"keywords\":[\"Culture & Society\",\"Defense & Security\",\"Domestic Politics\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Analysis\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2025\/04\/south-koreas-top-court-no-military-in-politics-no-presidential-overreach\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2025\/04\/south-koreas-top-court-no-military-in-politics-no-presidential-overreach\/\",\"name\":\"South Korea\u2019s top court: No military in politics, no presidential overreach - Korea Pro\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2025\/04\/south-koreas-top-court-no-military-in-politics-no-presidential-overreach\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2025\/04\/south-koreas-top-court-no-military-in-politics-no-presidential-overreach\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/assets.korearisk.com\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2025\/04\/1-2.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-04-07T08:53:25+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-04-07T08:53:25+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2025\/04\/south-koreas-top-court-no-military-in-politics-no-presidential-overreach\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2025\/04\/south-koreas-top-court-no-military-in-politics-no-presidential-overreach\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2025\/04\/south-koreas-top-court-no-military-in-politics-no-presidential-overreach\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/assets.korearisk.com\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2025\/04\/1-2.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/assets.korearisk.com\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2025\/04\/1-2.png\",\"width\":1870,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"A collage of former President Yoon Suk-yeol and a courtroom at the Constitutional Court | Image: ROK Presidential Office, Korea Pro, edited by Korea Pro\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2025\/04\/south-koreas-top-court-no-military-in-politics-no-presidential-overreach\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"South Korea\u2019s top court: No military in politics, no presidential overreach\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/\",\"name\":\"Korea Pro\",\"description\":\"Be smart about South Korea. Up-to-date analysis on foreign relations, politics, society and economy. Made by the producers of NK PRO and NK News.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Korea Pro\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/assets.korearisk.com\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2022\/11\/logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/assets.korearisk.com\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2022\/11\/logo.png\",\"width\":360,\"height\":50,\"caption\":\"Korea Pro\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/nknewsorg\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/southkoreapro\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"South Korea\u2019s top court: No military in politics, no presidential overreach - Korea Pro","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2025\/04\/south-koreas-top-court-no-military-in-politics-no-presidential-overreach\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"South Korea\u2019s top court: No military in politics, no presidential overreach - Korea Pro","og_description":"The Constitutional Court\u2019s unanimous decision to remove former President Yoon Suk-yeol from office reaffirmed that ultimate authority and responsibility for national security and defense policy rests with elected civilian leaders, not the military, setting a clear legal precedent against presidential overreach. The April 4 ruling not only clarified the limits of executive power but also […]","og_url":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2025\/04\/south-koreas-top-court-no-military-in-politics-no-presidential-overreach\/","og_site_name":"Korea Pro","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/nknewsorg\/","article_published_time":"2025-04-07T08:53:25+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1870,"height":1000,"url":"https:\/\/assets.korearisk.com\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2025\/04\/1-2.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"joonha.park","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@southkoreapro","twitter_site":"@southkoreapro","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Joon Ha Park","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2025\/04\/south-koreas-top-court-no-military-in-politics-no-presidential-overreach\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2025\/04\/south-koreas-top-court-no-military-in-politics-no-presidential-overreach\/"},"author":{"name":"joonha.park","@id":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/#\/schema\/person\/cc3b1d808ab580085098711a059f751d"},"headline":"South Korea\u2019s top court: No military in politics, no presidential overreach","datePublished":"2025-04-07T08:53:25+00:00","dateModified":"2025-04-07T08:53:25+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2025\/04\/south-koreas-top-court-no-military-in-politics-no-presidential-overreach\/"},"wordCount":1480,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2025\/04\/south-koreas-top-court-no-military-in-politics-no-presidential-overreach\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/assets.korearisk.com\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2025\/04\/1-2.png","keywords":["Culture & Society","Defense & Security","Domestic Politics"],"articleSection":["Analysis"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2025\/04\/south-koreas-top-court-no-military-in-politics-no-presidential-overreach\/","url":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2025\/04\/south-koreas-top-court-no-military-in-politics-no-presidential-overreach\/","name":"South Korea\u2019s top court: No military in politics, no presidential overreach - Korea Pro","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2025\/04\/south-koreas-top-court-no-military-in-politics-no-presidential-overreach\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2025\/04\/south-koreas-top-court-no-military-in-politics-no-presidential-overreach\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/assets.korearisk.com\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2025\/04\/1-2.png","datePublished":"2025-04-07T08:53:25+00:00","dateModified":"2025-04-07T08:53:25+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2025\/04\/south-koreas-top-court-no-military-in-politics-no-presidential-overreach\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2025\/04\/south-koreas-top-court-no-military-in-politics-no-presidential-overreach\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2025\/04\/south-koreas-top-court-no-military-in-politics-no-presidential-overreach\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/assets.korearisk.com\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2025\/04\/1-2.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/assets.korearisk.com\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2025\/04\/1-2.png","width":1870,"height":1000,"caption":"A collage of former President Yoon Suk-yeol and a courtroom at the Constitutional Court | Image: ROK Presidential Office, Korea Pro, edited by Korea Pro"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2025\/04\/south-koreas-top-court-no-military-in-politics-no-presidential-overreach\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"South Korea\u2019s top court: No military in politics, no presidential overreach"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/","name":"Korea Pro","description":"Be smart about South Korea. Up-to-date analysis on foreign relations, politics, society and economy. Made by the producers of NK PRO and NK News.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/#organization","name":"Korea Pro","url":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/assets.korearisk.com\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2022\/11\/logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/assets.korearisk.com\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2022\/11\/logo.png","width":360,"height":50,"caption":"Korea Pro"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/nknewsorg\/","https:\/\/x.com\/southkoreapro"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2209037"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10909"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2209037"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2209037\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2209047,"href":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2209037\/revisions\/2209047"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2209038"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2209037"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2209037"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2209037"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}