{"id":2207399,"date":"2024-12-05T18:11:54","date_gmt":"2024-12-05T09:11:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/?p=2207399"},"modified":"2024-12-12T12:38:02","modified_gmt":"2024-12-12T03:38:02","slug":"timeline-the-swift-rise-and-fall-of-martial-law-in-south-korea","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2024\/12\/timeline-the-swift-rise-and-fall-of-martial-law-in-south-korea\/","title":{"rendered":"Timeline: The swift rise and fall of martial law in South Korea"},"content":{"rendered":"
South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol declared nationwide emergency martial law in a late-night livestreamed address on Tuesday at around 10:25 p.m., citing threats from \u201canti-state forces\u201d attempting to subvert the government. He also accused the opposition Democratic Party (DP) of \u201cparalyzing\u201d governance, pointing to its push to cut the 2025 budget.<\/span><\/p>\n Around an hour later, Army Chief of Staff General Park An-su, whom Yoon appointed as the martial law commander, announced that Martial Law Decree No. 1 had taken effect as of 11 p.m.<\/span><\/p>\n The decree banned \u201call political activities,\u201d including National Assembly meetings, imposed control over the press, outlawed mass protests and strikes and allowed arrests without warrants. It included harsh language, such as promising to “punish and dispose of (\ucc98\ub2e8)” violators. This wording is different from the legal term for punishment, \ucc98\ubc8c, and is reminiscent of authoritarian decrees last used in South Korea over four decades ago.<\/span><\/p>\n The declaration sparked immediate backlash. Crowds gathered at the National Assembly, demanding Yoon rescind the measure and resign. Despite police blockades and the arrival of airborne troops in an apparent attempt to prevent lawmakers from voting, 190 legislators convened and unanimously passed a resolution urging the repeal of martial law.<\/span><\/p>\n By 4:30 a.m. Wednesday, Yoon agreed to lift the declaration, but political turmoil continued. All 191 opposition lawmakers filed an impeachment motion later in the day and referred Yoon to the Seoul Central Prosecutors\u2019 Office on charges of insurgency.<\/span><\/p>\n High-ranking officials, including the chief of staff and cabinet members, tendered their resignations as Yoon went missing for most of Wednesday, reportedly staying at his residence.<\/span><\/p>\n Yoon re-emerged in the evening for a meeting with Prime Minister Han Duck-soo, ruling People Power Party (PPP) leader Han Dong-hoon, PPP floor leader Choo Kyung-ho and other senior PPP lawmakers, though details of their discussion were not disclosed.<\/span><\/p>\n Korea Pro<\/span><\/i> compiled key developments and primary materials, translated into English, to help readers understand the sequence of events leading up to and following the two-and-a-half-hour martial law regime. These events are categorized into three phases: the months leading up to Dec. 3, the day martial law was declared and the aftermath of its repeal.<\/span><\/p>\n Ruling People Power Party lawmakers, including party leader Han Dong-hoon standby at the National Assembly building and the party’s auditorium, Dec. 3, 2024 | Image: People Power Party<\/a><\/em><\/p><\/div>\n PO<\/strong>LITICAL CONTEXT: H2 2024\u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n Aug. 27<\/b><\/p>\n South Korea\u2019s Cabinet approved the 2025 budget proposal of about $478.5 billion (677.4 trillion won).<\/span><\/p>\n Sept. 2<\/b><\/p>\n The Yoon administration submitted its 2025 budget proposal to the National Assembly.<\/span><\/p>\n Separately, o<\/span>pposition DP lawmakers questioned then-defense minister nominee Kim Yong-hyun \u2014 later identified as a key figure behind Yoon\u2019s decision to declare martial law \u2014 about rumors that he sought to declare martial law during his confirmation hearing. Kim dismissed the questions as \u201clies\u201d and \u201cpropaganda.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n The DP had raised concerns over reports of informal meetings among Yoon\u2019s high school alumni in military and ministerial positions.<\/span><\/p>\n When asked if he would support a martial law declaration if confirmed as defense minister, Kim denied any such intentions, saying that that is \u201cnot something that could possibly happen in this day and age.\u201d He added that even if such an order were given, the military would not comply.<\/span><\/p>\n Prime Minister Han Duck-soo said during a parliamentary budget committee meeting that the government was not preparing to declare martial law with plans to arrest lawmakers who could make it void. DP leader Lee Jae-myung raised such suspicions on Sept. 1 during a live broadcast of his meeting with PPP leader Han Dong-hoon.<\/span><\/p>\n On Dec. 4, a defense ministry official, speaking anonymously, <\/span>confirmed<\/span><\/a> to local media that Kim had suggested the declaration to Yoon on Dec. 3.<\/span><\/p>\n Nov. 7\u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n Amid growing controversies over leaked recordings allegedly linking a political broker to Yoon and first lady Kim Keon-hee, the president held a major press conference. Yoon opened with an apology for the scandals surrounding his family but stopped short of offering clarity.<\/span><\/p>\n He dismissed the DP\u2019s push to investigate his wife as \u201cpolitical propaganda\u201d and potentially unconstitutional overreach, asserting that the matters had already been thoroughly examined. His remarks drew criticism from across the political spectrum.<\/span><\/p>\n President Yoon Suk-yeol apologizes during a televised press conference, Nov. 7, 2024 | Image: ROK Presidential Office<\/a><\/em><\/p><\/div>\n Nov. 8\u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n Yoon\u2019s approval ratings hit a record low of 17% in a Gallup Korea poll, with most respondents citing issues related to the first lady as the primary reason for disapproval.<\/span><\/p>\n Nov. 15<\/b><\/p>\n DP leader Lee Jae-myung was convicted of election law violations and sentenced to one year in prison with a two-year suspension.<\/span><\/p>\n Nov. 25<\/b><\/p>\n In the first trial of a separate case, Lee was acquitted of charges of soliciting perjury.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Nov. 27<\/b><\/p>\n Yoon vetoed a bill calling for a special prosecutorial investigation into first lady Kim Keon-hee\u2019s alleged stock manipulation and other scandals. This marked his third veto of similar legislation, following earlier rejections in January and October.<\/span><\/p>\n Dec. 2\u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n The DP introduced impeachment motions against top prosecutors and the chief state auditor, citing their handling of cases related to the first lady.<\/span><\/p>\n The presidential office condemned the moves as \u201cunprecedented in our constitutional history,\u201d accusing the DP of undermining constitutional order out of \u201crevenge\u201d for unsatisfactory investigation results.<\/span><\/p>\n The Speaker of the National Assembly postponed a planned budget discussion to Dec. 10, citing missed legal deadlines for review and urging the ruling and opposition parties to resume negotiations.<\/span><\/p>\n DP lawmaker Park Sun-won later <\/span>claimed<\/span><\/a> that military units, including the elite 707th Special Mission Battalion, began receiving standby orders on Dec. 2, with external training reportedly canceled. Park attributed this information to unnamed military sources.<\/span><\/p>\n MARTIAL LAW DECLARATION\u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n Dec. 3<\/b><\/p>\n 3:40 p.m. <\/b>Yoon concluded a meeting with Kyrgyzstan\u2019s president, announcing the establishment of a comprehensive partnership.<\/span><\/p>\n
\n
\n