{"id":2207318,"date":"2024-11-29T16:48:14","date_gmt":"2024-11-29T07:48:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/?p=2207318"},"modified":"2024-12-02T17:00:41","modified_gmt":"2024-12-02T08:00:41","slug":"yoon-and-south-koreas-opposition-pivot-on-policy-eyeing-political-center","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2024\/11\/yoon-and-south-koreas-opposition-pivot-on-policy-eyeing-political-center\/","title":{"rendered":"Yoon and South Korea\u2019s opposition pivot on policy, eyeing political center"},"content":{"rendered":"
South Korean politics is witnessing an unusual shift as President Yoon Suk-yeol and opposition leader Lee Jae-myung move away from traditional stances on policies relating to business and the economy.<\/span><\/p>\n Yoon, who focused on small government and fiscal conservatism during the first half of his term, is now advocating for expanded welfare spending to address \u201c<\/span>economic polarization<\/span><\/a>.\u201d And despite internal <\/span>pushback<\/span><\/a>, some in his office are apparently <\/span>discussing<\/span><\/a> supplementary budgets \u2014 a policy tool he once criticized his predecessor for overusing.<\/span><\/p>\n Meanwhile, Lee is increasingly <\/span>adopting<\/span><\/a> pro-business stances and supporting corporate-friendly policies that seem at odds with his previous stances. His top aides have also <\/span>referred<\/span><\/a> to him as \u201cpro-business\u201d in media interviews, an apparent attempt to promote a new image.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n This follows Lee’s series of meetings with business leaders where he endorsed corporate-friendly reforms such as separate taxation on dividends and repeatedly emphasized that “growth is the foundation of welfare.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n The timing of these shifts reflects mounting political pressures on both leaders as South Korea faces immediate economic challenges and looming external risks.<\/span><\/p>\n THE THREAT<\/b><\/p>\n South Korea faces major external economic risks as a highly export-dependent country. The International Monetary Fund and Seoul\u2019s own institutions lowered its economic growth forecasts for 2025, and the urgency appears heightened by President-elect Donald Trump’s plans to impose aggressive tariffs upon taking office in January.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n This outlook has translated into concerns from not just businesses but also the general public, <\/span>contributing<\/span><\/a> to a recent downward spiral in consumer expectations for the economy in the new year.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Just this week, the Bank of Korea made a surprise cut to the base rate, while lowering the GDP growth forecast to 1.9% for 2025, citing risks related to a protectionist U.S. administration\u2019s return and heightened global financial volatility.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Although South Korea needs to improve policies on various social issues such as housing, education inequality and the low birth rate, the ruling People Power Party (PPP) continues to <\/span>emphasize<\/span><\/a> fiscal discipline.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n This is one of the many indicators of the <\/span>divergence<\/span><\/a> between the administration and ruling party, and of the conflict between Yoon and PPP leader Han Dong-hoon that has been escalating for months.<\/span><\/p>\n Then-U.S. President Donald Trump is applauded after delivering a State of the Union address on Feb. 28, 2017. | Image: Trump White House<\/p><\/div>\n YOON\u2019S CALCULATIONS<\/b><\/p>\n It appears that one of President Yoon\u2019s main <\/span>priority<\/span><\/a> during the second half of his tenure is improving his administration\u2019s public appeal rather than maintaining airtight policy consultation and <\/span>alignment<\/span><\/a> with the ruling party.<\/span><\/p>\n Yoon\u2019s approval ratings remain stuck in the low 20s as he passes his presidency’s halfway mark, with public dissatisfaction mostly driven by first lady-related <\/span>scandals<\/span><\/a>, Yoon\u2019s communication style and reliability, and the economy, according to Gallup Korea polls.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Public dissatisfaction is unlikely to disappear after Yoon vetoed yet another bill on a special prosecutorial probe targeting his wife earlier this week, and it appears the president is focusing on garnering support by pushing to \u201cresolve economic polarization,\u201d expanding welfare policies and increasing fiscal spending.<\/span><\/p>\n However, this strategy risks alienating fiscal conservatives within his party and longtime PPP supporters who prioritize small government principles. The calculation appears to be that gaining centrist voters will offset any potential loss in base support, though this remains untested.<\/span><\/p>\n LEE\u2019S CALCULATIONS<\/b><\/p>\n Lee’s rightward shift on economic policies appears strategically timed with his legal <\/span>challenges<\/span><\/a>. With his political future uncertain due to ongoing court battles, Lee seems to be using this period to fundamentally reshape his image.<\/span><\/p>\n This transformation from progressive firebrand to business-friendly centrist is likely aimed at distancing himself from his previous positions and promoting himself as a more palatable candidate to a broader electorate.<\/span><\/p>\n His increasingly pro-business remarks in the past few weeks come as he has simultaneously faced two major court rulings that could bar him from running in the 2027 presidential elections, although he was acquitted in the second case.<\/span><\/p>\n The verdict has temporarily lowered the risk for the Democratic Party (DP), which is likely to continue pursuing a strategy that positions Lee as a potential presidential frontrunner for the time being, rather than actively seeking an alternative.<\/span><\/p>\n His recent <\/span>endorsement<\/span><\/a> of eliminating the financial investment tax, <\/span>easing<\/span><\/a> criminal liability for breach of trust and separate taxation on dividends, alongside his meetings with business leaders, suggest a calculated effort to rebuild his image from a progressive figure powered by left-wing supporters seeking economic equality to a pragmatic centrist that supports a corporate-driven economic growth model.<\/span><\/p>\n