{"id":2205618,"date":"2024-07-01T19:28:12","date_gmt":"2024-07-01T10:28:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/?p=2205618"},"modified":"2024-07-02T18:27:45","modified_gmt":"2024-07-02T09:27:45","slug":"how-south-koreas-democratic-decay-has-worsened-under-president-yoon-suk-yeol","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2024\/07\/how-south-koreas-democratic-decay-has-worsened-under-president-yoon-suk-yeol\/","title":{"rendered":"How South Korea\u2019s democratic decay has worsened under President Yoon Suk-yeol"},"content":{"rendered":"
South Korea has experienced systematic and sustained erosion of democratic norms and institutions since President Yoon Suk-yeol took office in May 2022, according to a comprehensive <\/span>Korea Pro<\/span><\/i> analysis of multiple indicators, with trends that began under the conservative president\u2019s predecessor not only continuing but significantly worsening in some cases.<\/span><\/p>\n In the July 2020 journal article \u201c<\/span>South Korea\u2019s Democratic Decay<\/span><\/a>,\u201d Stanford professor Gi-wook Shin generated heated debate by arguing that a series of actions by then-ROK President Moon Jae-in \u2014 including politically motivated investigations, infringements on press freedom, social polarization and the suppression of civil society \u2014 underscored democratic backsliding under the progressive administration.<\/span><\/p>\n However, <\/span>Korea Pro\u2019s<\/span><\/i> analysis suggests that despite Yoon\u2019s bold and regular rhetoric about the importance of <\/span>freedom<\/span><\/a>, <\/span>democracy<\/span><\/a> and <\/span>human rights<\/span><\/a> \u2014 trends Shin flagged as evidence of democratic backsliding in 2020 \u2014 those trends have continued unabated, with South Korea\u2019s performance even worsening in other areas.<\/span><\/p>\n The key trendlines from the past two years that point to democratic backsliding include:<\/span><\/p>\n But that is not to say that the state of the country\u2019s democracy has backtracked in every way. For instance, despite Yoon\u2019s reputation for being \u201canti-feminist,\u201d multiple datasets indicate that South Korea\u2019s global ranking on issues of gender equality has improved from administration to administration.<\/span><\/p>\n Consistency between the Yoon and Moon administrations is also notable in a range of areas, suggesting the structure of South Korean politics creates inherent challenges that persist across different governments.<\/span><\/p>\n An illustration of Seoul’s skyline turning black and white | Image: Korea Pro<\/em><\/p><\/div>\n POLITICAL INVESTIGATIONS AND APPOINTMENTS<\/b><\/p>\n One of the clearest parallels between the two administrations is the use of politically motivated investigations to target opponents and critics, as well as appointments of politically convenient individuals to key postings.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n After the protests that ended the Park administration, the professor Shin pointed to the Moon administration\u2019s campaign of \u201ceradicating deep-rooted evils\u201d as being particularly problematic when it came to upholding democratic norms.<\/span><\/p>\n Shin and <\/span>others<\/span><\/a> have cited extensive investigations and purges by the Moon government surrounding decisions made by the foreign and unification ministries, as well as the spy service and education ministry, as attempts to settle political scores with the former Park Geun-hye administration.<\/span><\/p>\n Further, Shin pointed to arrests of senior judges and appointment of left-leaning former judges and prosecutors to high-level presidential office positions as evidence of blurring the lines between presidential power and judicial independence.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n All these trends have continued under Yoon.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Extensive investigations, raids and purges have taken place regarding the actions of key Moon-era personnel in the <\/span>spy service<\/span><\/a>, <\/span>defense<\/span><\/a>, <\/span>unification, industry, ICT<\/span><\/a> and <\/span>energy<\/span><\/a> ministries with part of this process leading to the <\/span>indictment of former national security advisor Suh Hoon<\/span><\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n Likewise, <\/span>investigations<\/span><\/a> into opposition leader <\/span>Lee Jae-myung<\/span><\/a> and the main opposition Democratic Party\u2019s think tank raised eyebrows and fueled accusations of political retribution.<\/span><\/p>\n Meanwhile, Yoon\u2019s <\/span>placement of friendly figures<\/span><\/a>, <\/span>prosecutor colleagues<\/span><\/a> and <\/span>other acquaintances<\/span><\/a> in positions of power triggered <\/span>concerns<\/span><\/a> about the abuse of public authority.<\/span><\/p>\n Though these factors are persistent phenomena in South Korean politics, the situation appears to have worsened under Yoon compared to the Moon Jae-in era.<\/span><\/p>\n This may be why the ROK dropped so much during the Yoon administration on the V-Dem\u2019s Liberal Democracy Index, which ranks countries according to their performance in areas such as judicial independence, separation of powers and checks and balances within political systems:<\/span><\/p>\n A similar trend can be observed in the Economist Intelligence Unit\u2019s \u201cDemocracy Index,\u201d which shows South Korea rising to its highest-ever ranking of 16 in the penultimate year of Moon Jae-in\u2019s presidency and dropping to 24 in the first year of the Yoon administration:<\/span><\/p>\n DETERIORATING FREEDOM OF SPEECH<\/b><\/p>\n A closer examination of the state of freedom of speech under the Moon and Yoon administrations reveals a disturbing pattern of sustained government hostility toward individuals and media outlets critical of their policies.<\/span><\/p>\n Under Moon, the government\u2019s approach to media criticism was characterized by a mix of heavy-handed tactics and subtle pressure, Shin wrote in 2020.<\/span><\/p>\n In particular, he cited several areas of concern: a \u201c<\/span>war on fake news<\/span><\/a>\u201d that urged state agencies to report false or misleading news, the <\/span>suing of a professor<\/span><\/a> for telling readers to avoid voting for the Democratic Party, think tanks being pressured to not \u201cwrite or say anything\u201d that will \u201cupset the administration\u201d and <\/span>defunding<\/span><\/a> of the U.S.-Korea Institute in Washington for rejecting a Blue House demand to fire its conservative-leaning director.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Jung Pak of the Brookings Institute later <\/span>drew attention<\/span><\/a> to the Moon administration\u2019s <\/span>repression<\/span><\/a> of local North Korea human rights NGOs during the 2018-2019 summits with Pyongyang as evidence of undue interference in ROK citizens\u2019 right to freedom of expression.<\/span><\/p>\n Fast-forward to 2024 and evidence suggests the Yoon administration has not only continued this trend but has taken it to new heights, with <\/span>Korea Pro\u2019s<\/span><\/i> investigation showing a particular sensitivity to reports about the president and the first lady. Evidence includes:<\/span><\/p>\n Further, the Yoon administration has charged individuals and organizations for alleged breaches of the National Security Act at a level much higher than under Moon Jae-in, 2023 data shows.<\/span><\/p>\n Though the year Yoon took power showed a decline in the use of the law against government critics, cases shot up to nearly 60 in his first full year of leadership. Use of the law tends to increase under conservative-leaning presidencies, as the data shows also during the Park Geun-hye era:<\/span><\/p>\n With high-profile use of the law on occasions like the <\/span>indictment<\/span><\/a> of senior officials at a major trade union, the <\/span>investigation<\/span><\/a> of a liberal opposition lawmaker, raids on <\/span>two regional<\/span><\/a> trade union offices and the <\/span>targeting<\/span><\/a> of activists, some in the ROK speculate that there has been a deliberate \u201c<\/span>ramping up<\/span><\/a>\u201d of national security investigations under the Yoon administration.<\/span><\/p>\n Additionally, South Korea has also dropped significantly in international press freedom rankings during Yoon\u2019s presidency.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n In 2023, the ROK <\/span>fell four spots<\/span><\/a> to 47 on a ranking of the world\u2019s most free press environments. In 2024, the ROK dropped to <\/span>62nd<\/span><\/a> place. This follows progress during the Moon administration when the ROK floated between 41st and 43rd place:<\/span><\/p>\n But legal action and coercion toward journalists have not been the only weapon in the government’s arsenal.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Both the Moon and Yoon administrations sought to delegitimize and undermine the credibility of the media in the eyes of the public.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Shin drew attention to Moon’s \u201cwar on fake news,\u201d with the administration encouraging citizens to report \u201cfalse or misleading news accounts\u201d to law enforcement.<\/span><\/p>\n Yoon, too, has regularly spoken about the issue of fake news, suggesting it is a <\/span>major threat<\/span><\/a> to democratic decision-making systems.<\/span><\/p>\n \u201cFake news threatens elections, which are the foundation of democracy, by inciting people to make wrong decisions based on information that is not true,\u201d Yoon said during the third <\/span>Summit for Democracy<\/span><\/a> in March. \u201cThis is a clear provocation and challenge against democracy.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n The cumulative effect of these actions has been to create an increasingly hostile environment for the press in South Korea.<\/span><\/p>\n Korea Queer Culture Festival 2014, June 7, 2014 | Image: Piotrus<\/a> via Wikimedia Commons<\/a>, Edited by Korea Pro<\/em><\/p><\/div>\n MARGINALIZED COMMUNITIES\u2019 STRUGGLE<\/b><\/p>\n Though Shin\u2019s 2020 analysis didn\u2019t look closely at how the Moon administration treated South Korea\u2019s marginalized communities, policies that recognize and protect women and marginalized communities reflect a commitment to equality and non-discrimination, which are cornerstones of democratic governance.<\/span><\/p>\n A comparative analysis of the treatment of marginalized communities, particularly LGBTQ+ individuals and people with disabilities, under the Moon and Yoon administrations reveals a troubling lack of progress and, in some cases, a deterioration of rights and protections.<\/span><\/p>\n Under Moon, negative developments included <\/span>his opposition to homosexuality<\/span><\/a> during his presidential election campaign, his <\/span>failure to enact<\/span><\/a> anti-discrimination laws for the marginalized and <\/span>little progress<\/span><\/a> on the gender pay gap or military regulations surrounding gay personnel.<\/span><\/p>\n\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n