{"id":2203965,"date":"2024-02-27T17:32:35","date_gmt":"2024-02-27T08:32:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/?p=2203965"},"modified":"2024-02-27T19:11:40","modified_gmt":"2024-02-27T10:11:40","slug":"cinema-and-controversy-merge-in-south-koreas-historical-debate","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2024\/02\/cinema-and-controversy-merge-in-south-koreas-historical-debate\/","title":{"rendered":"Cinema and controversy merge in South Korea\u2019s historical debate"},"content":{"rendered":"

In South Korea, the documentary \u201cThe Birth of Korea\u201d is attracting significant attention, with <\/span>one million tickets<\/span><\/a> sold in a nation of about 50 million. This film, which chronicles the life of Syngman Rhee, South Korea\u2019s first president, is emerging as a focal point in the ongoing debate over the nation\u2019s history.<\/span><\/p>\n

Amid its popularity, the documentary raises critical concerns about the potential distortion of historical facts and its use as a tool for political manipulation. These risks are particularly pertinent given the film\u2019s timing, its widespread endorsement by conservative politicians, and the broader debate over South Korea\u2019s historical narrative.<\/span><\/p>\n

The circumstances surrounding the movie\u2019s popularity highlight its role beyond that of a historical recounting. As the documentary garners attention and ticket sales, it brings to the forefront the delicate balance between historical documentation and the shaping of public perception.<\/span><\/p>\n

RESPONSE TO \u201812.12: THE DAY?\u2019<\/b><\/p>\n

\u201cThe Birth of Korea\u201d enters a scene already influenced by politically themed movies, especially after \u201c12.12: The Day.\u201d This earlier film, focusing on Chun Doo-hwan\u2019s 1979 military coup, sold <\/span>over 10 million tickets<\/span><\/a> in November and December.<\/span><\/p>\n

Its box office success led to varied political reactions. Main opposition Democratic Party (DP) lawmakers <\/span>encouraged voters<\/span><\/a> to see the film, claiming its <\/span>popularity<\/span><\/a> reflected dissatisfaction with the conservative Yoon administration.<\/span><\/p>\n

In contrast, the ruling People Power Party (PPP) argued that the opposition was misinterpreting the film\u2019s success, emphasizing that it was the conservative Kim Young-sam government that dismantled the coup\u2019s military legacy. They <\/span>criticized<\/span><\/a> the opposition for drawing inappropriate parallels between past military rulers and the current administration.<\/span><\/p>\n

However, suggesting \u201c12.12: The Day\u201d was made solely for election purposes simplifies its impact. The film\u2019s significant budget and focus on dramatizing historical events suggest financial motives alongside any political intentions. Its popularity, particularly among <\/span>young people<\/span><\/a> who praised it online, indicates that its success was more than just politically motivated.<\/span><\/p>\n

In contrast, \u201cThe Birth of Korea\u201d is achieving success under very different conditions.<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"

A promotional poster for \u201c<\/span>The Birth of Korea,\u201d<\/span> a film that has attracted 1 million ticket sales as of Tuesday | Image: Docustory’s Young Kim via Facebook<\/a><\/em><\/p><\/div>\n

MOBILIZING VOTERS<\/b><\/p>\n

Concerns have been raised about the methods used to boost ticket sales for \u201cThe Birth of Korea.\u201d Reports indicate that <\/span>Protestant churches<\/span><\/a> in South Korea have organized large group viewings, and <\/span>Truth Forum<\/span><\/a>, a conservative organization, has offered reimbursements to moviegoers aged 18 to 40.<\/span><\/p>\n

High-profile conservative figures have also publicly endorsed the film. Interim PPP leader <\/span>Han Dong-hoon<\/span><\/a> expressed gratitude toward the director, stating that Syngman Rhee played a pivotal role in shaping modern South Korea. <\/span>President Yoon Suk-yeol<\/span><\/a> also commended the film for providing an opportunity to \u201ccorrectly assess\u201d historical narratives.<\/span><\/p>\n

These actions suggest that the film\u2019s success is partially attributed to orchestrated efforts, aligning it with conservative ideologies and making its viewership a symbol of political alignment among conservatives.<\/span><\/p>\n

MORE THAN A MOVIE<\/b><\/p>\n

\u201cThe Birth of Korea\u201d could influence April\u2019s general election by energizing the ruling party\u2019s conservative base and through strategic mobilization efforts. However, the documentary\u2019s relevance transcends immediate political contests.<\/span><\/p>\n

This film represents a concerted effort by conservative scholars, journalists, and activists to counteract perceived attempts by progressives and North Korea to \u201c<\/span>erase<\/span><\/a>\u201d Syngman Rhee\u2019s role in South Korean history. The documentary makes its intent clear, educating viewers on its perspective throughout its 100-minute running time.<\/span><\/p>\n

It challenges the prevailing view of Rhee as a dictator, particularly focusing on the <\/span>rigged March 1960 election<\/span><\/a> in which Rhee was reelected for a fourth presidential term and the <\/span>April Revolution of 1960<\/span><\/a>, which resulted in 180 fatalities and thousands of injuries during the suppression of pro-democracy protests.<\/span><\/p>\n

The narrative then revisits Rhee\u2019s life chronologically, lauding his accomplishments and offering counterpoints to criticisms. Topics discussed include Rhee\u2019s attempts to liberate Korea from Japanese occupation, refutations that he contributed to the Korean Peninsula\u2019s division or that he fled from the front lines during the Korean War, and his diplomatic efforts that culminated in the U.S.-ROK Mutual Defense Treaty.<\/span><\/p>\n

The documentary includes interviews with several foreign experts, seemingly aimed at providing a semblance of impartiality. However, the selection of these experts and the presentation of their views raise questions about the film\u2019s objectivity.<\/span><\/p>\n

For instance, David P. Fields, an associate director of the Center for East Asian Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, who frequently appears in the film, mostly provides positive or neutral comments about Rhee.<\/span><\/p>\n

However, Fields\u2019 own written work presents a more nuanced view. In his book \u201c<\/span>Foreign Friends<\/span><\/a>,\u201d he writes that Rhee \u201cdid not live up to his billing as Korea\u2019s \u2018apostle of democracy\u2019\u201d and that Rhee saw \u201chimself as the ultimate guardian of the possibility of Korean democracy, even as he ran roughshod over the Republic of Korea\u2019s legislature.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

This discrepancy suggests that the documentary may have selectively edited contributions to align with its narrative.<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"

Ruling People Power Party interim leader Han Dong-hoon pays his respects at the burial site of former President Syngman Rhee at Seoul’s National Cemetery, Jan. 1, 2024 | Image: People Power Party<\/em><\/p><\/div>\n

THE BIGGER PICTURE<\/b><\/p>\n

\u201cThe Birth of Korea\u201d represents only a part of a broader campaign aimed at redefining Syngman Rhee\u2019s historical image. This initiative extends beyond the documentary, encompassing ongoing efforts to establish a Syngman Rhee <\/span>presidential library<\/span><\/a> and erect a <\/span>statue<\/span><\/a> of him in front of the ROK Embassy in Washington D.C.<\/span><\/p>\n

Additionally, efforts to alter public perception of Rhee are evident in various activities. Truth Forum, which not only helped mobilize viewership for \u201cThe Birth of Korea\u201d but also contributed to its production, has organized <\/span>public seminars<\/span><\/a> discussing Rhee\u2019s legacy. Further, <\/span>conservative media outlets<\/span><\/a> have published articles attempting to discredit academics perceived as part of the \u201cmovement to erase\u201d Rhee\u2019s historical significance.<\/span><\/p>\n

The endeavor to memorialize Rhee with monuments seeks to do more than merely polish his image; it aims to fundamentally reinterpret the roles of former authoritarian figures, historically linked with conservative politics in South Korea, as vital to the nation\u2019s development.<\/span><\/p>\n

The objective is to recast these figures as national heroes, as depicted in \u201cThe Birth of Korea,\u201d contrasting with their portrayal as villains in works like \u201c12.12: The Day.\u201d This strategy reflects a deliberate effort to influence the collective memory and historical narrative concerning South Korea\u2019s path to its current state.<\/span><\/p>\n

PART OF A GLOBAL TREND<\/b><\/p>\n

The resurgence of reinterpretations of history and instances of denialism is not unique to any one region or era but is part of a global trend that has seen renewed vigor in recent times.<\/span><\/p>\n

The conflict between Israel and Hamas, which erupted last year, has been accompanied by an alarming increase in <\/span>anti-Semitism<\/span><\/a> and <\/span>Holocaust denialism<\/span><\/a> in Western countries. Similarly, in East Asia, Japan has long been accused of denying the Japanese state\u2019s involvement in the <\/span>systematic sexual enslavement<\/span><\/a> of \u201ccomfort women\u201d during World War II.<\/span><\/p>\n

While \u201cThe Birth of Korea\u201d does not quite rise to the extremes of Holocaust denialism or the dismissal of Japan\u2019s wartime atrocities, it sets a concerning precedent with its treatment of historical events.<\/span><\/p>\n

The documentary\u2019s approach to the <\/span>Jeju Massacre<\/span><\/a> of 1948, which resulted in the deaths of over 14,000 civilians \u2014 though some estimates suggest a higher toll \u2014 is particularly troubling. One figure in the film even suggested that de-centering victims of the massacre would lead to a more objective appraisal of the event, a dangerous statement seemingly intended to justify state violence.<\/span><\/p>\n

The endorsement of \u201cThe Birth of Korea\u201d by conservative political figures, including Yoon, raises additional concerns. Such support, especially when viewed against the administration\u2019s professed commitment to human rights and democracy, casts these stances in a new and potentially contradictory light.<\/span><\/p>\n

While catering to conservative constituents in the lead-up to elections might be a tactical move, embracing contentious historical narratives can lead to significant and lasting ramifications.<\/span><\/p>\n

Edited by John Lee<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n

Culture & Society<\/span><\/a>Domestic Politics<\/span><\/a><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In South Korea, the documentary \u201cThe Birth of Korea\u201d is attracting significant attention, with one million tickets sold in a nation of about 50 million. This film, which chronicles the life of Syngman Rhee, South Korea\u2019s first president, is emerging as a focal point in the ongoing debate over the nation\u2019s history. Amid its popularity, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10909,"featured_media":2203981,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[25,27],"yoast_head":"\nCinema and controversy merge in South Korea\u2019s historical debate - KOREA PRO<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2024\/02\/cinema-and-controversy-merge-in-south-koreas-historical-debate\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cinema and controversy merge in South Korea\u2019s historical debate - KOREA PRO\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In South Korea, the documentary \u201cThe Birth of Korea\u201d is attracting significant attention, with one million tickets sold in a nation of about 50 million. This film, which chronicles the life of Syngman Rhee, South Korea\u2019s first president, is emerging as a focal point in the ongoing debate over the nation\u2019s history. Amid its popularity, […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2024\/02\/cinema-and-controversy-merge-in-south-koreas-historical-debate\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"KOREA PRO\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/nknewsorg\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-02-27T08:32:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-02-27T10:11:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2024\/02\/Untitled-design-5.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"935\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"500\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"joonha.park\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@southkoreapro\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@southkoreapro\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Benjamin A. Engel\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2024\/02\/cinema-and-controversy-merge-in-south-koreas-historical-debate\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2024\/02\/cinema-and-controversy-merge-in-south-koreas-historical-debate\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"joonha.park\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/#\/schema\/person\/655b61707429f29f2eaaf3953fc9a70e\"},\"headline\":\"Cinema and controversy merge in South Korea\u2019s historical debate\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-02-27T08:32:35+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-02-27T10:11:40+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2024\/02\/cinema-and-controversy-merge-in-south-koreas-historical-debate\/\"},\"wordCount\":1336,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"Culture & Society\",\"Domestic Politics\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Analysis\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2024\/02\/cinema-and-controversy-merge-in-south-koreas-historical-debate\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2024\/02\/cinema-and-controversy-merge-in-south-koreas-historical-debate\/\",\"name\":\"Cinema and controversy merge in South Korea\u2019s historical debate - KOREA PRO\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2024-02-27T08:32:35+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-02-27T10:11:40+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2024\/02\/cinema-and-controversy-merge-in-south-koreas-historical-debate\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2024\/02\/cinema-and-controversy-merge-in-south-koreas-historical-debate\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2024\/02\/cinema-and-controversy-merge-in-south-koreas-historical-debate\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Cinema and controversy merge in South Korea\u2019s historical debate\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/\",\"name\":\"KOREA PRO\",\"description\":\"Be smart about South Korea. Up-to-date analysis on foreign relations, politics, society and economy. Made by the producers of NK PRO and NK News.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/#organization\",\"name\":\"KOREA PRO\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2022\/11\/logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2022\/11\/logo.png\",\"width\":360,\"height\":50,\"caption\":\"KOREA PRO\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/nknewsorg\/\",\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/southkoreapro\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cinema and controversy merge in South Korea\u2019s historical debate - KOREA PRO","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2024\/02\/cinema-and-controversy-merge-in-south-koreas-historical-debate\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cinema and controversy merge in South Korea\u2019s historical debate - KOREA PRO","og_description":"In South Korea, the documentary \u201cThe Birth of Korea\u201d is attracting significant attention, with one million tickets sold in a nation of about 50 million. This film, which chronicles the life of Syngman Rhee, South Korea\u2019s first president, is emerging as a focal point in the ongoing debate over the nation\u2019s history. Amid its popularity, […]","og_url":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2024\/02\/cinema-and-controversy-merge-in-south-koreas-historical-debate\/","og_site_name":"KOREA PRO","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/nknewsorg\/","article_published_time":"2024-02-27T08:32:35+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-02-27T10:11:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":935,"height":500,"url":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2024\/02\/Untitled-design-5.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"joonha.park","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@southkoreapro","twitter_site":"@southkoreapro","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Benjamin A. Engel","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2024\/02\/cinema-and-controversy-merge-in-south-koreas-historical-debate\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2024\/02\/cinema-and-controversy-merge-in-south-koreas-historical-debate\/"},"author":{"name":"joonha.park","@id":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/#\/schema\/person\/655b61707429f29f2eaaf3953fc9a70e"},"headline":"Cinema and controversy merge in South Korea\u2019s historical debate","datePublished":"2024-02-27T08:32:35+00:00","dateModified":"2024-02-27T10:11:40+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2024\/02\/cinema-and-controversy-merge-in-south-koreas-historical-debate\/"},"wordCount":1336,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/#organization"},"keywords":["Culture & Society","Domestic Politics"],"articleSection":["Analysis"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2024\/02\/cinema-and-controversy-merge-in-south-koreas-historical-debate\/","url":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2024\/02\/cinema-and-controversy-merge-in-south-koreas-historical-debate\/","name":"Cinema and controversy merge in South Korea\u2019s historical debate - KOREA PRO","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/#website"},"datePublished":"2024-02-27T08:32:35+00:00","dateModified":"2024-02-27T10:11:40+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2024\/02\/cinema-and-controversy-merge-in-south-koreas-historical-debate\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2024\/02\/cinema-and-controversy-merge-in-south-koreas-historical-debate\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2024\/02\/cinema-and-controversy-merge-in-south-koreas-historical-debate\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Cinema and controversy merge in South Korea\u2019s historical debate"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/","name":"KOREA PRO","description":"Be smart about South Korea. Up-to-date analysis on foreign relations, politics, society and economy. Made by the producers of NK PRO and NK News.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/#organization","name":"KOREA PRO","url":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2022\/11\/logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2022\/11\/logo.png","width":360,"height":50,"caption":"KOREA PRO"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/nknewsorg\/","https:\/\/twitter.com\/southkoreapro"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2203965"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10909"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2203965"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2203965\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2203983,"href":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2203965\/revisions\/2203983"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2203981"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2203965"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2203965"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2203965"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}