{"id":2203965,"date":"2024-02-27T17:32:35","date_gmt":"2024-02-27T08:32:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/?p=2203965"},"modified":"2024-02-27T19:11:40","modified_gmt":"2024-02-27T10:11:40","slug":"cinema-and-controversy-merge-in-south-koreas-historical-debate","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2024\/02\/cinema-and-controversy-merge-in-south-koreas-historical-debate\/","title":{"rendered":"Cinema and controversy merge in South Korea\u2019s historical debate"},"content":{"rendered":"
In South Korea, the documentary \u201cThe Birth of Korea\u201d is attracting significant attention, with <\/span>one million tickets<\/span><\/a> sold in a nation of about 50 million. This film, which chronicles the life of Syngman Rhee, South Korea\u2019s first president, is emerging as a focal point in the ongoing debate over the nation\u2019s history.<\/span><\/p>\n Amid its popularity, the documentary raises critical concerns about the potential distortion of historical facts and its use as a tool for political manipulation. These risks are particularly pertinent given the film\u2019s timing, its widespread endorsement by conservative politicians, and the broader debate over South Korea\u2019s historical narrative.<\/span><\/p>\n The circumstances surrounding the movie\u2019s popularity highlight its role beyond that of a historical recounting. As the documentary garners attention and ticket sales, it brings to the forefront the delicate balance between historical documentation and the shaping of public perception.<\/span><\/p>\n RESPONSE TO \u201812.12: THE DAY?\u2019<\/b><\/p>\n \u201cThe Birth of Korea\u201d enters a scene already influenced by politically themed movies, especially after \u201c12.12: The Day.\u201d This earlier film, focusing on Chun Doo-hwan\u2019s 1979 military coup, sold <\/span>over 10 million tickets<\/span><\/a> in November and December.<\/span><\/p>\n Its box office success led to varied political reactions. Main opposition Democratic Party (DP) lawmakers <\/span>encouraged voters<\/span><\/a> to see the film, claiming its <\/span>popularity<\/span><\/a> reflected dissatisfaction with the conservative Yoon administration.<\/span><\/p>\n In contrast, the ruling People Power Party (PPP) argued that the opposition was misinterpreting the film\u2019s success, emphasizing that it was the conservative Kim Young-sam government that dismantled the coup\u2019s military legacy. They <\/span>criticized<\/span><\/a> the opposition for drawing inappropriate parallels between past military rulers and the current administration.<\/span><\/p>\n However, suggesting \u201c12.12: The Day\u201d was made solely for election purposes simplifies its impact. The film\u2019s significant budget and focus on dramatizing historical events suggest financial motives alongside any political intentions. Its popularity, particularly among <\/span>young people<\/span><\/a> who praised it online, indicates that its success was more than just politically motivated.<\/span><\/p>\n In contrast, \u201cThe Birth of Korea\u201d is achieving success under very different conditions.<\/span><\/p>\n