{"id":2202859,"date":"2023-11-24T08:00:22","date_gmt":"2023-11-23T23:00:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/?p=2202859"},"modified":"2023-11-23T16:34:44","modified_gmt":"2023-11-23T07:34:44","slug":"south-korean-court-orders-japan-to-compensate-wartime-slavery-victims","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2023\/11\/south-korean-court-orders-japan-to-compensate-wartime-slavery-victims\/","title":{"rendered":"South Korean court orders Japan to compensate wartime slavery victims"},"content":{"rendered":"
The Seoul High Court on Thursday <\/span>overturned<\/span><\/a> a 2021 decision by the Seoul Central District Court, which had <\/span>dismissed<\/span><\/a> a damages lawsuit filed by victims of Japan\u2019s wartime sexual slavery, citing sovereign immunity. The appellate court ordered Japan to compensate each victim more than $150,000 (200 million won). The victims, often referred to as \u201ccomfort women,\u201d had initially filed the lawsuit in 2016.<\/span><\/p>\n The appellate court stated that it is reasonable to recognize the jurisdiction of South Korean courts over the defendant Japanese government under customary international law. The court recognized the illegal acts committed by Japan in the mobilization of comfort women and affirmed the need for appropriate compensation. This follows a separate ruling in January, where another court ordered Japan to pay $77,000 (100 million won) each to a different group of 12 victims in a decision rejecting Japan\u2019s sovereign immunity defense for crimes against humanity.<\/span><\/p>\n Why It Matters<\/b><\/p>\n The Seoul High Court\u2019s ruling on Thursday ordering Japan to compensate wartime sexual slavery victims sharply contrasts with President Yoon Suk-yeol\u2019s previous positions on similar issues. Earlier this year, Yoon\u2019s diplomatic outreach to Japan, which only addressed forced wartime laborers, conspicuously excluded the issue of \u201ccomfort women.\u201d Yoon <\/span>proposed<\/span><\/a> creating a foundation funded by \u201cvoluntary\u201d contributions from South Korean companies like POSCO, which benefited from the 1965 normalization of South Korea-Japan relations. This <\/span>fund<\/span><\/a>, also involving the Federation of Korean Industries and the Japan Business Federation, was intended to compensate the laborers, thereby absolving Japan of direct responsibility. However, the court\u2019s decision challenges this approach by holding the Japanese government directly accountable.<\/span><\/p>\n This verdict could strain the recently <\/span>improving<\/span><\/a> Seoul-Tokyo relations. The rapid improvement of diplomatic and trade ties might encounter difficulties, particularly with regional security threats highlighted by North Korea\u2019s <\/span>spy satellite launch<\/span><\/a>. Tokyo\u2019s likely rejection of the Seoul High Court\u2019s ruling may stir up anti-Japanese sentiments in South Korea. While Yoon\u2019s approval ratings <\/span>remained stable<\/span><\/a> in April when he expressed his disagreement with the idea that Japan should be compelled to seek forgiveness for historical events from a century ago, the upcoming parliamentary elections and his <\/span>low approval ratings<\/span><\/a> could alter Yoon\u2019s strategy. Yoon\u2019s response to the ruling will be critical in influencing the trajectory of Seoul-Tokyo relations.<\/span><\/p>\n