{"id":2201943,"date":"2023-08-09T17:56:15","date_gmt":"2023-08-09T08:56:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/?p=2201943"},"modified":"2023-11-20T17:32:43","modified_gmt":"2023-11-20T08:32:43","slug":"south-koreas-dual-economy-manufacturing-might-vs-service-slump","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2023\/08\/south-koreas-dual-economy-manufacturing-might-vs-service-slump\/","title":{"rendered":"South Korea\u2019s dual economy: Manufacturing might vs service slump"},"content":{"rendered":"
South Korea\u2019s growth trajectory, while commendable by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development\u2019s (OECD) benchmarks, reveals deeper structural economic concerns. Although the nation consistently inches closer to the advanced post-industrial countries in economic output, examining the drivers of this growth provides a clearer picture:<\/span><\/p>\n UNVEILING THE SERVICE SECTOR<\/b><\/p>\n The lion\u2019s share of <\/span>South Korea\u2019s trade<\/span><\/a> pertains to <\/span>goods<\/span><\/a>, with services forming a <\/span>relatively small proportion<\/span><\/a> of total trade. The professional service sector\u2019s robust regulation in South Korea, <\/span>shielding<\/span><\/a> it from international competition, underscores a broader economic narrative \u2014 the service sector\u2019s <\/span>muted competitiveness<\/span><\/a> relative to its manufacturing counterpart.<\/span><\/p>\n In contrast, the country\u2019s manufacturing landscape is highly competitive. Its industrial cornerstones range from advanced washing machines and ships to state-of-the-art smartphones and televisions. This export-driven approach has consistently reinforced the sector\u2019s competitive edge, driving continuous upskilling and fostering progression up the value chain.<\/span><\/p>\n However, South Korea is not a manufacturing hub with a small service sector attached. A significant chunk of its economy, mirroring global economic patterns, is non-tradable. These are sectors resistant to international trade due to logistical or regulatory hindrances.<\/span><\/p>\n This bracket encompasses professional services, whose trade potential remains untapped due to regulatory constraints. Also, it extends to less high-profile sectors like catering, retail and hospitality, which comprise much of Korea\u2019s gross domestic product.<\/span><\/p>\n Supporting this perspective, <\/span>data<\/span><\/a> from the South Korean National Assembly Budget Office reveals that while the manufacturing sector’s output stood at $399.38 billion (525.5 trillion won) in 2022, services stood at $851.2 billion (1.12 quadrillion won).<\/span><\/p>\n A deeper dive shows that the electronics segment, including semiconductors, clocked an output of $135.13 billion (177.8 trillion won). In comparison, the combined might of the wholesale, retail and hospitality sectors stood at $139.08 billion (183 trillion won).<\/span><\/p>\n The service sector, in sheer volume, dwarfs manufacturing. Even its largest components \u2014 wholesale, retail and hospitality \u2014 surpass South Korea\u2019s biggest export sector \u2014 electronics. For perspective, other economic sectors like agriculture, forestry and fishing reached $24.85 billion (32.7 trillion won); mining touched $1.37 billion (1.8 trillion won); utilities summed up to $37.16 billion (48.9 trillion won); and construction capped at $66.2 billion (87.1 trillion won).<\/span><\/p>\n An illustration of an oil tanker being constructed at a shipyard | Image: Korea Pro<\/em><\/p><\/div>\n DRAG ON GROWTH<\/b><\/p>\n While the South Korean service sector is vast, it confronts significant headwinds that impede economic growth. Typically, economies flourish by leveraging more labor and capital or by raising labor productivity, capital and other factors.<\/span><\/p>\n Regrettably, South Korea\u2019s labor productivity trajectory has dimmed. It stagnated in the 2000s, experienced negative growth post-2010 and has not witnessed tangible growth since the 1990s. In purchasing power parity terms, the nation\u2019s labor force productivity lags, only outpacing a handful of OECD countries like Greece, Chile, Mexico and Colombia.<\/span><\/p>\n A clear visualization of the polarization of South Korean workplaces emerges when studying the country\u2019s wholesale and retail sectors. Large firms, defined as businesses that employ 250 or more workers, boast some of the highest productivity rates in the OECD. These firms\u2019 per capita output trumps that of their German, French and Belgian counterparts, according to a Korea Productivity Center <\/span>report<\/span><\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n However, the narrative shifts when considering small and medium-sized firms (SMEs), according to the same report. Their productivity, while respectable, falls behind nations like Belgium and Denmark. Complicating matters, these SMEs dominate the South Korean market, accounting for a staggering 90% \u2014 leading to substantial implications for industry efficiency. This SME prevalence contrasts sharply with markets like Germany and France, where the revenue distribution is more balanced.<\/span><\/p>\n The hospitality sector, encompassing hotels and restaurants, mirrors these dynamics, albeit more acutely. In South Korea, SMEs overwhelmingly dominate, contributing to nearly 98% of sector revenue. It\u2019s noteworthy that South Korean SMEs and large enterprises are highly productive by OECD standards, despite the evident gap.<\/span><\/p>\n\n