{"id":2201593,"date":"2023-07-06T08:00:22","date_gmt":"2023-07-05T23:00:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/?p=2201593"},"modified":"2023-07-05T15:49:17","modified_gmt":"2023-07-05T06:49:17","slug":"democratic-party-mulls-japanese-seafood-import-ban-over-fukushima-water-release","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2023\/07\/democratic-party-mulls-japanese-seafood-import-ban-over-fukushima-water-release\/","title":{"rendered":"Democratic Party mulls Japanese seafood import ban over Fukushima water release"},"content":{"rendered":"
Members of the Democratic Party (DP) <\/span>announced<\/span><\/a> Wednesday that they will consider legislation banning the import of all Japanese seafood if Tokyo releases the ALPS-treated water stored at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station without the consent of its neighboring countries, according to DP spokesperson Lee So-young during a press conference. The DP\u2019s announcement came in the wake of a <\/span>statement<\/span><\/a> by International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) director general Rafael Mariano Grossi saying that Tokyo\u2019s plans to release the ALPs-treated water are \u201cconsistent with relevant international safety standards.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n Lee also said that the DP is keen to strengthen and collaborate with a coalition of international organizations and civic groups to oppose the release of the ALPS-treated water. DP lawmakers are also preparing to meet with Grossi during his <\/span>visit<\/span><\/a> to the ROK later this week. Additionally, opposition lawmakers are scheduled to visit Tokyo, where they intend to hold a press conference to share the Korean public\u2019s concerns. <\/span>About 80%<\/span><\/a> of the South Korean public is opposed to the release of the ALPS-treated water.<\/span><\/p>\n Why It Matters<\/b><\/p>\n The Democratic Party\u2019s (DP) proposed legislation to prohibit all imports of Japanese seafood in response to Tokyo\u2019s decision to discharge ALPS-treated water from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station appears to be more symbolic than actionable. Although the party does hold a majority in South Korea\u2019s unicameral parliament, it falls short of the substantial majority required to surmount a <\/span>presidential veto<\/span><\/a>. Consequently, their ability to enforce such a ban independently may be constrained.<\/span><\/p>\n President Yoon Suk-yeol will likely impede the legislation, if passed, considering his ongoing endeavors to enhance diplomatic relations with Japan. Under the Yoon administration, the South Korean government has publicly <\/span>expressed<\/span><\/a> its respect for the outcome of the International Atomic Energy Agency\u2019s (IAEA) safety review.<\/span><\/p>\n Rather than an actionable plan, the DP\u2019s calls for an import ban serve to underscore what the party perceives as weaknesses in the Yoon administration, including its foreign and labor policies. By appearing more attuned to public concerns about the Fukushima situation, the party could aim to galvanize voter support, irrespective of the slim likelihood of their proposed ban becoming law.<\/span><\/p>\n