{"id":2200805,"date":"2023-04-25T17:30:57","date_gmt":"2023-04-25T08:30:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/?p=2200805"},"modified":"2023-04-26T19:17:22","modified_gmt":"2023-04-26T10:17:22","slug":"south-koreas-pension-fund-careens-toward-demographic-cliff","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2023\/04\/south-koreas-pension-fund-careens-toward-demographic-cliff\/","title":{"rendered":"South Korea\u2019s pension fund careens toward demographic cliff"},"content":{"rendered":"
In the short term, South Korea\u2019s national pension finds itself in a favorable position. The country boasts low debt, high savings rates, a highly educated workforce and some of the region\u2019s most advanced technology firms, and the pension system has managed to run a surplus for years.<\/span><\/p>\n But looking not far into the future, it\u2019s evident that looming demographic challenges due to the country\u2019s world-lowest birth and fertility rates pose serious problems for the sustainability of the National Pension Fund (NPS), which is at the center of retirement planning for tens of millions of South Koreans.<\/span><\/p>\n By 2050, approximately 40% of the population will be over 65, with 25% over 80. Retirement ages may increase, but questions remain about who will cover the medical and living expenses of those who cannot work when over 25% of the population is over 80.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n An analysis of the NPS situation indicates:<\/span><\/p>\n ROSE-TINTED FOREGROUND<\/b><\/p>\n South Korea offers only modest welfare provisions and spends far less than the OECD average on various welfare and <\/span>social programs<\/span><\/a>, including support for senior citizens.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n This is partly due to the fact that many South Koreans rely on family networks, but the government has made efforts to <\/span>improve<\/span><\/a> the situation in the form of a guaranteed pension for low-income senior citizens.<\/span><\/p>\n Nevertheless, the level of support provided to the elderly remains relatively low, and many senior citizens still live in <\/span>poverty<\/span><\/a>, which remains widespread by the standards of rich countries.<\/span><\/p>\n One consequence of the modest welfare payouts is that the National Pension Fund (NPS) is able to run a large surplus even with remarkably <\/span>low<\/span><\/a> mandatory contribution levels by OECD standards. The NPS operates on a contributory principle, where one receives benefits based on one\u2019s contributions, and this system has enabled the country\u2019s reserve fund to <\/span>increase<\/span><\/a> by nearly 50% since 2016.<\/span><\/p>\n In the short term, this means that the pension fund is on stable footing and will continue to <\/span>grow in size<\/span><\/a> until 2040. However, due to sudden demographic changes over the past 40 years, it appears that the fund will be exhausted only 15 years after it peaks in size.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Contributions would have to rise to over 25% (from the current 9%) to cover obligations once the fund is depleted.<\/span><\/p>\n TWEAKS AND QUICK FIXES<\/b><\/p>\n A significant area of concern in the national pension is its management. In recent years, the system has seen massive returns; however, quantitative easing across the Western world (though not in <\/span>South Korea<\/span><\/a> until the COVID-19 pandemic) has pushed up the value of financial assets.<\/span><\/p>\n In other words, it is easy to post strong returns when prices for most things are surging, but what about when markets are less forgiving?<\/span><\/p>\n Some have <\/span>called<\/span><\/a> for deepening the technical expertise in running the NPS and shifting away from the home market, where the NPS concentrates most of its capital. Although the NPS has invested a significant amount of its capital in foreign stocks, its overseas bond portfolio remains underdeveloped compared to its holdings in the domestic market.<\/span><\/p>\n However, given the <\/span>hits<\/span><\/a> many foreign financial institutions have taken on bonds outside the Korean market, this may not have been a bad thing in the short run.<\/span><\/p>\n There is also concern that the NPS, as a significant shareholder in many listed companies, is <\/span>overly<\/span><\/a> biased toward the management of the firms in which it is invested. South Korea\u2019s problems with <\/span>corporate governance<\/span><\/a> may be exacerbated by a large, passive government investor that essentially allows management in the country\u2019s firms to make decisions that may not benefit the shareholders.<\/span><\/p>\n The NPS has previously behaved in ways that appear to have been overtly <\/span>against<\/span><\/a> the interests of its ultimate stakeholders \u2014 its current and future recipients \u2014 as a consequence of the criminal conduct of its former director.<\/span><\/p>\n While criminal behavior is unavoidable in any human society, moving away from the home market, especially given South Korea\u2019s less-than-stellar growth prospects and the political problems associated with investing domestically, may help to make the fund less potentially captive to political interests.<\/span><\/p>\n\n