{"id":2200600,"date":"2023-04-03T20:11:27","date_gmt":"2023-04-03T11:11:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/?p=2200600"},"modified":"2023-11-20T18:38:31","modified_gmt":"2023-11-20T09:38:31","slug":"why-foreign-journalists-in-south-korea-get-second-rate-access-to-government","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2023\/04\/why-foreign-journalists-in-south-korea-get-second-rate-access-to-government\/","title":{"rendered":"Why foreign journalists in South Korea get second-rate access to government"},"content":{"rendered":"
Foreign media unable to access South Korean government ministries and excluded from background briefing opportunities. Artificial embargoes set by Korean reporters that delay the delivery of breaking news. Hurdles that complicate and in some cases prevent international media from obtaining primary source documents.<\/span><\/p>\n
These are some of the problems blighting the ROK\u2019s media ecosystem, which has for decades operated on a two-level basis that overtly favors local media over the international press, even though no rules or laws exist to formally justify the prejudice.<\/span><\/p>\n
While there have been some improvements in foreign media outlets\u2019 access to the ROK government in recent years, there is little hope the situation will improve significantly.<\/span><\/p>\n
That\u2019s because the government fears the consequences that creating an equal playing field would create among the Korean press corps, former government spokespersons, long-time journalists on the peninsula and media commentators told <\/span>Korea Pro<\/span><\/i>.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
But remedies to equalize government access for local and foreign media do exist, some observers say, with at least one ministry having already created a precedent that could be applied elsewhere.<\/span><\/p>\n
THE PROBLEM<\/b><\/p>\n
South Korean journalists\u2019 privileged access to the government contributes to numerous problems for international news consumers, say those familiar with the local media ecosystem.<\/span><\/p>\n
The lack of equal access to some of the most critical government ministries in South Korea is the clearest example of where this two-track approach is most felt.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Local journalists selected to each ministry\u2019s press corps \u2014 or “kijadan” \u2014 may attend regular briefings held exclusively for Korean reporters and even work daily within the assigned ministry. Foreigners \u2014 in most cases \u2014 have no access to these opportunities.<\/span><\/p>\n
Ministries also usually share news of forthcoming government decisions and announcements with Korean reporters in each “kijadan” ahead of their foreign counterparts. Further, Korean reporters who have worked for local and international media outlets confirm that ministry spokespeople who engage with local media tend to have senior positions compared to those who engage with international ones.<\/span><\/p>\n
Worse, press corps reporters often agree to artificially delay embargoes on releasing news gathered from within their ministries to allow for the convenience of taking a coffee or lunch break, multiple correspondents in Seoul familiar with the system told <\/span>Korea Pro<\/span><\/i>.<\/span><\/p>\n
\u201cI was really shocked when I first went to the defense ministry,\u201d said a Korean staffer now working at an international news agency but who previously worked for a local outlet.<\/span><\/p>\n
North Korea had conducted its first-ever submarine ballistic missile launch, the staffer said, but Korean journalists who got the information during a Ministry of National Defense (MND) briefing event decided to wait to publish it.<\/span><\/p>\n
\u201cSome of the senior reporters said: \u2018Let’s do that at two. Yes, cool. Let’s go,\u2019\u201d the staffer recounted, to allow time for a mutually agreed lunch break. \u201cI was really shocked.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n
Beyond the embargoes, foreign media often encounter problems obtaining primary source information.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
For instance, international media can find it almost impossible to obtain court documents from some jurisdictions that are easily accessible to local reporters. In addition, some ministries delay distributing statements or press releases to foreign journalists, with chatrooms for local reporters getting preference over those for foreign media.<\/span><\/p>\n
\u201cI’m very often surprised that most [ROK] government officials just don’t know about this,\u201d said the Korean staffer. \u201cThey just don’t understand why we have to have this two-tier system.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n
The two-track system also creates burdens for professionals at the government level.<\/span><\/p>\n
\u201cWe can’t publicize information in an effective, efficient way, as we have to have two sessions,\u201d said a former ministry spokesperson on condition of anonymity.<\/span><\/p>\n
As the ROK attracts growing global attention, and more international news organizations open bureaus in Seoul, the current system leaves much to be desired in light of the Yoon administration\u2019s goal for the ROK to become a \u201cglobal pivotal state.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n
\u201cI lived in the U.S. for years, and I never heard [of the government] trying to distinguish between foreign and U.S. media,\u201d a former Blue House official told <\/span>Korea Pro<\/span><\/i>.<\/span><\/p>\n
\u201cAs soon as you step into Korea, it\u2019s foreign and non-foreign,\u201d the former official continued. \u201c[So there\u2019s] a huge war between foreign and Korean media.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n
Andrew Salmon, a veteran Korea correspondent, also added that the problem \u201cebbs and flows from administration to administration.\u201d It cannot be defined as a \u201cleft-wing or right-wing\u201d issue.<\/span><\/p>\n
An illustration of a photographer | Image: Korea Pro<\/em><\/p><\/div>\n
GOVERNMENT FEARS<\/b><\/p>\n
The two-track South Korean press access system is a hangover of a bygone era that has calcified and will be difficult to change due to resistance from local media, former spokespersons and press workers told <\/span>Korea Pro<\/span><\/i>.<\/span><\/p>\n
\u201cIf you look at how the \u201ckijadan\u201d is run and managed, I think it’s the same as how it\u2019s done in Japan,\u201d said a Korean reporter working at an international media outlet, talking on condition of anonymity due to not being permitted to provide comments to third-party media.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\u201cWe still have a lot of Japanese systems,\u201d echoed a correspondent at a Korean media outlet on condition of anonymity for the same reason.<\/span><\/p>\n
But the government can\u2019t seem to break the two-track system even if it wanted to.<\/span><\/p>\n
\u201cI think the main stumbling block \u2026 is that local reporters on many government beats don’t want it [the two-track system to change], and they pressure the ministries [they\u2019re assigned to] not to allow it,\u201d said Mike Breen, who covered South Korea for decades as a journalist.<\/span><\/p>\n
Other observers say government officials fear what might happen if they ignore local media outlets\u2019 demands.<\/span><\/p>\n
Unnecessarily upsetting local media could have long-term consequences, the former Blue House official explained.<\/span><\/p>\n
\u201cPublic opinion is often shaped by the media \u2014 and your role as press secretary is to do your best so that [negative trends] don\u2019t happen,\u201d they said.<\/span><\/p>\n
\u201cMaybe they would forgive it if it happened just once or twice, but treating foreign media equally for an extended period? No government or press secretary could bear [the consequences of doing] that. If the [local] press turns their back against the ministry, it can look like a war.\u201d\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Former ROK President Park Geun-hye\u2019s fate is a clear case of why the government might be fearful of upsetting local media, explained the locally hired reporter at an international outlet.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n