{"id":2200444,"date":"2023-03-20T14:36:16","date_gmt":"2023-03-20T05:36:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/?p=2200444"},"modified":"2023-04-05T16:07:54","modified_gmt":"2023-04-05T07:07:54","slug":"why-there-are-reasons-to-worry-about-south-korea-banks-after-svb-collapse","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2023\/03\/why-there-are-reasons-to-worry-about-south-korea-banks-after-svb-collapse\/","title":{"rendered":"Why there are reasons to worry about South Korea banks after SVB collapse"},"content":{"rendered":"
The failure of the <\/span>Silicon Valley Bank (SVB)<\/span><\/a> has rattled markets in the U.S. and raised fears that <\/span>other banks<\/span><\/a> could follow suit. While the effects in Asia have so far been minimal, the high-profile collapse nonetheless raises questions about the health of South Korea\u2019s own banking system.<\/span><\/p>\n SVB was a medium-sized bank by U.S. standards, and its collapse had a limited <\/span>direct impact<\/span><\/a> on South Korean investors. SVB collapsed due to distinctive investment strategies and rising interest rates.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n But other banks, including those in South Korea, may also be <\/span>vulnerable<\/span><\/a> given persistent inflation and potential further interest rate increases.<\/span><\/p>\n A Korea Pro Analysis indicates:<\/span><\/p>\n BANK HEALTH<\/b><\/p>\n Banking is a risky business. It involves taking people\u2019s cash (bank deposits) for interest (a cost for the bank) and lending them out to other people for interest (income for the bank). Banks also invest people\u2019s savings in stocks, bonds and other assets to generate a return. The spread between the rate banks pay savers and the rates of return it generates on assets, including loans to other people, is how a bank makes profits.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n The biggest issue here is what is called the <\/span>maturity mismatch<\/span><\/a>. Depositors can withdraw their cash at any time, but a bank often cannot demand full repayment of a loan or sell the securities (shares, bonds and other financial instruments) on demand at cost. This mismatch can lead to bank failures if enough depositors demand their money back at once.<\/span><\/p>\n To prevent bank failure, banks are required to hold a certain amount of capital in reserve. The key measure here is tier-1 capital, which refers to the portion of the bank\u2019s equity considered riskless or at least near riskless. This includes cash and common stock.<\/span><\/p>\n Since the <\/span>Asian financial crisis<\/span><\/a> of the late 1990s \u2014 South Korean banks have sought to maintain large and <\/span>growing<\/span><\/a> capital buffers against potential losses. The large banks are <\/span>especially<\/span><\/a> well-capitalized, with ratios similar to or higher than major <\/span>U.S. banks<\/span><\/a>, though below the European <\/span>average<\/span><\/a>.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n However, like banks elsewhere (in the U.S. and the <\/span>E.U.<\/span><\/a>), Korean banks have taken substantial <\/span>losses<\/span><\/a> on the value of their assets due to rising interest rates, which have pushed down the value of many financial assets. These are <\/span>book losses<\/span><\/a> \u2014 the assets remain on the books and have not been sold for a loss.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n The size of the losses is <\/span>not<\/span><\/a> that large. Further, these losses have resulted from violent swings in interest rates and stock market declines, swings that appear unlikely to be repeated going forward. But crises are not just a product of the fundamentals; speculative manias and panics often drive markets up and down.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Moreover, there are clear signs of vulnerability in the Korean financial system. Like the U.S., with its increasingly fragile-looking <\/span>regional banks<\/span><\/a>, some of Korea\u2019s savings banks have <\/span>less healthy<\/span><\/a> capital buffers and more <\/span>worrisome<\/span><\/a> loan books.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n The most obvious way a crisis might emerge is through the <\/span>housing market<\/span><\/a>. The banks have lent a great deal to households to finance purchases, though most of this lending has gone to households with <\/span>good<\/span><\/a> credit ratings.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Project financing<\/span><\/a> (PF) for construction is the more immediate source of vulnerability. As the Bank of Korea\u2019s (BOK) most recent Monetary Credit Policy Report <\/span>made<\/span><\/a> clear, non-banking financial institutions, like insurers, savings banks, securities firms and credit card companies, have been heavily involved in such lending.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n PF is riskier than mortgage lending because, in case of a real estate market downturn, the owners of the new property being financed may have to sell it at a discount or even be unable to sell it. When the housing market goes bad, more PF tends to go bad more quickly than mortgage lending, or at least, that is the assumption undergirding the higher interest rates PF borrowers pay.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n A crisis with PF could hurt the financial system generally, with banks and other financial institutions needing cash injections or being forced to cut back on lending. Currently, overall delinquency rates across the financial industry are <\/span>low<\/span><\/a>, but there are risks that will worry the central bank and financial regulators going forward.<\/span><\/p>\n\n