Pexels<\/a><\/p><\/div>\nCULTURAL EXPLANATIONS<\/b><\/p>\n
Another factor contributing to the staid and clunky format of Korean conferences, orthodox speakers and the abundance of manels is the cultural characteristics of the ROK itself.<\/span><\/p>\n\u201cThe business culture in Korea can still be remarkably top-down and task-oriented in the way you find in the military,\u201d said Breen of Insight Communications. \u201cThis would explain the good logistics \u2014 but it can also explain poor content in that people responsible lack the experience or are not given the leeway to be creative in developing a program.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\nThis means that the intended audience for Korean conferences may be the organizers themselves \u2014 not the attendees or participants.<\/span><\/p>\n\u201cThe real audience for any employee is their boss [and] employees will only put consumers first if required to,\u201d Breen continued. \u201cIf the bosses are egocentric, want to promote themselves or lack a feel for the issues, the employee will be distracted.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\nIn addition, the former think tank organizer said that so many of the key decision makers at Korean conferences are in positions for long periods of time and are reluctant to try anything new.<\/span><\/p>\n\u201cIt’s really the same old people organizing events,\u201d they said. \u201cSo there’s no real exchange of views (with younger staff) in terms of who to invite or what kind of discussions or what kind of format would be good.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\nThis old boys\u2019 club approach to conference planning infrastructure leads to gender imbalances.<\/span><\/p>\n\u201cI think this is a serious issue that is visible not only in conferences but also in the wider Korean society,\u201d said a Korean policy insider with experience in both private and public research institutions.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\u201cThe lack of diversity may be more so in conferences because educational\/public institutions are very hierarchical and have a seniority system in which women have disadvantages.\u201d But they added that Korean organizers, especially older ones, \u201cdon\u2019t even realize that such a problem exists.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\nThe former think tank <\/span>organizer<\/span> agreed: Comments from conference participants about the need for more women were \u201cnot taken very seriously\u201d by Korean organizers.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nA Korean cultural focus on seniority is likely contributing to the problem, said Yeo of Brookings.<\/span><\/p>\n\u201cThere are a number of excellent female analysts and scholars out there, many who might be seen as rising stars or emerging scholars,\u201d he explained. \u201cBut they are still operating at the junior level, and conference organizers may pass them over for their more senior (and often male) colleagues.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\nAnd Kim the MC said there was also a structural prejudice against women in areas like military expertise.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\u201cNo matter how experienced you are as a female, there’s that nuance that, oh, you don’t really know what you’re talking about because you’re a woman and you’ve never been to the military,\u201d she said. All South Korean men serve in the army under a national conscription system.<\/span><\/p>\nConferences in Korea normally include a photo session to document the event for posterity | Image: Korea Pro<\/p><\/div>\n
ESTABLISHING \u2018NATIONAL CONSENSUS\u2019<\/b><\/p>\n
Meanwhile, the South Korean government often sees conferences as a necessary practice to legitimize some policy, statement or trend.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\u201cThe main aim of these events is to gain policy legitimacy \u2026 [which is] most visible after the government announces policies that seem distinctive, politically or diplomatically,\u201d said the Korean policy insider.<\/span><\/p>\nOne such example was when the former Moon Jae-in administration dived headlong into engagement with North Korea, resulting in a flurry of \u201cpeace forums\u201d all over the nation \u2014 often on large budgets and at significant scale.<\/span><\/p>\n\u201cThe government uses such events to explain their new policies to professionals as well as the public,\u201d the policy insider explained. \u201cUsually, a large number of people who support the new policies\/strategies come to these events and it would seem like there is strong consensus in the society.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\nThat\u2019s why there are often so many people on stage; the utilization of ambiguous panel topics helps create ties to other panels, enabling the government host to bring in so many speakers to each session.<\/span><\/p>\n\u201cThese events are also used as tools to distribute rents not only to your supporters but also those who are critical, and to solidify support for your policies,\u201d the insider continued.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nBy hosting at expensive hotels, instead of local government halls or venues, organizers can more successfully convince critics of a new policy and change their way of thinking, the insider explained.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nThe insider, who has been involved in government-linked events, told <\/span>Korea Pro<\/span><\/i> that panelists may be paid hundreds of dollars to speak for just a few minutes. Then, surrounded by five-star luxury accommodations and other \u201cbig names\u201d around you, one is primed to change their thinking in a way that more aligns with the government, they said.<\/span><\/p>\nAnd though the insider said similar approaches may take place in other countries, \u201cit feels like there are way too many conferences with these characteristics in Korea.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\nWhen new policy goals are established, extended conferences including dozens of speakers can appear to give a sense of consensus | Image: Korea Pro<\/p><\/div>\n
CHANGING THE SCENE<\/b><\/p>\n
With so much spent on events and conferences in South Korea, there is a lot of potential for change and growth. As mentioned above, frequent conference participants can find positive attributes \u2014 such as implementation, speedy turnarounds and emphasis on networking outside the event \u2014 that organizers in other countries could learn from.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\u201cIf we want to see more of these conferences providing more value, I think there should be more debate,\u201d said Kim the MC. That, in turn, could lead to larger portions of the general public being interested, versus the typical audience blend of invited speakers, host staff and fellow industry peers, she said.<\/span><\/p>\nFeaturing more women would also make sense, she and others said. “If they went out and looked for the best people, many will be female,\u201d said Bohn of Edge Communications.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nAnd if events don\u2019t start improving, it\u2019s likely that they could become increasingly irrelevant, Coyner of Softlanding Consulting said. \u201cWhy leave one’s office, home [or] nation to travel to some place at the expense of time and money when one can get 90% of the value online \u2026 often for free or little cost?\u201d<\/span><\/p>\nYeji Chung contributed to this report. Edited by Arius Derr.<\/span><\/i><\/p>\nBusiness & Economy<\/span><\/a>Culture & Society<\/span><\/a><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Conferences on ill-defined themes and hundreds of speakers with little related expertise. Panels crowded with more than a dozen speakers at a single time. Slides overflowing with text. Lineups featuring no women whatsoever. These are just some of the issues regularly plaguing South Korea\u2019s conference circuit, which despite being an industry worth almost U.S. $10 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10207,"featured_media":2199549,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[24,25],"class_list":["post-2199546","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-analysis","tag-business-economy","tag-culture-society"],"yoast_head":"\n
Why conferences in Korea are (mostly) a waste of time and resources - KOREA PRO<\/title>\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n