{"id":2198923,"date":"2022-09-12T07:17:13","date_gmt":"2022-09-12T07:17:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.nknews.org\/koreapro\/?p=2198923"},"modified":"2023-04-05T16:11:38","modified_gmt":"2023-04-05T07:11:38","slug":"south-korea-reins-in-budget-spending-in-face-of-demographic-time-bomb","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/koreapro.org\/2022\/09\/south-korea-reins-in-budget-spending-in-face-of-demographic-time-bomb\/","title":{"rendered":"South Korea reins in budget spending in face of demographic time bomb"},"content":{"rendered":"
The South Korean government has recently unveiled its 2023 budget, which President Yoon Suk-yeol will soon submit to the National Assembly. The country is in an unusual fiscal position compared to the average developed country, with less debt, a smaller government and more net government and public sector wealth.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n But after escaping COVID-19 economic shocks that plagued many other advanced economies, South Korea now faces a far worse fiscal future because of rapid population aging and rising associated costs. This year\u2019s budget represents a 5% increase on the original budget of 2022, but a 6% decrease if supplementary budget appropriations are also included in calculations.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n In reality, if the rate of <\/span>consumer price inflation<\/span><\/a> and <\/span>producer price inflation<\/span><\/a> are accounted for, a nominal 5% increase in the budget may actually represent a real term decline. The new government slowed the pace of growth in government outlays from the 8.7% average between 2018 and 2022.<\/span><\/p>\n A <\/span>Korea Pro <\/span><\/i>analysis of the South Korean budget reveals:\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Economy and Finance Choo Kyung-ho is presenting the government’s 2023 budget at Government Complex in Sejong on Aug. 25, 2022 | Image: Ministry of Economy and Finance<\/a><\/p><\/div>\n ROK FISCAL POSITION<\/b><\/p>\n South Korea is in an unusual fiscal position by the standards of Europe, North America and much of the OECD. Over the past two decades, it has consistently had a significantly <\/span>smaller<\/span><\/a> government as a percentage of gross domestic product (GDP), and its government debt is also far <\/span>smaller<\/span><\/a> than the average.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n The Korean government is also far <\/span>wealthier<\/span><\/a> than average, and the net asset position of the broader public sector has also <\/span>improved<\/span><\/a> over the past five years.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Further, <\/span>deficit spending<\/span><\/a> during the pandemic has been far more circumscribed than much of the rest of the developed world because lockdowns have had far less effect on the economy.<\/span><\/p>\n At the same time, the size of the government has increased considerably in the past five years, with annual spending growth reaching a remarkable 8.7% per annum under the Moon Jae-in government. The <\/span>stock<\/span><\/a> of government debt has also increased by well over 60% in that time and the stock of debt relative to GDP <\/span>increased<\/span><\/a> 14 percentage points \u2014 more than double any of the last three governments.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n One of the main reasons for this is that the <\/span>tax burden<\/span><\/a>, even though it has risen, has not kept up with budgetary expense growth. Even when social insurance is <\/span>included<\/span><\/a>, the burden has only increased by 1.2 percentage points of GDP from 2017 (and remains historically <\/span>low<\/span><\/a> by OECD standards). There is now growing talk of reforming pensions due to rapid population aging, including the <\/span>depoliticization<\/span><\/a> of appointments to the leadership of the fund (to maximize returns), and <\/span>raising<\/span><\/a> both contributions and the retirement age cumulatively over the coming decades.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n The government budget rose from 400 trillion won ($289.5 billion) in 2017 to 600 trillion in 2022 (not including supplementary budget outlays). This included significant <\/span>increases<\/span><\/a> in welfare spending (in a country known for the <\/span>spartan<\/span><\/a> state of its welfare programs). This in a time when the economy was growing points to a lack of political willingness to address the need for more government revenue in a country that is unusually <\/span>reliant<\/span><\/a> on corporate taxes relative to much of the OECD. Generally, more comprehensive welfare states are more reliant on a combination of a high, progressive <\/span>income tax<\/span><\/a> with fewer deductions and high rates of <\/span>value-added taxation<\/span><\/a> (VAT).<\/span><\/p>\n At the same time, South Korea\u2019s long-term fiscal health is very much in doubt, though it is not as if the developed world is a <\/span>paragon<\/span><\/a> of fiscal health, where long-term GDP growth, tax revenue and debt prospects look far from uplifting according to current <\/span>projections<\/span><\/a>.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n The Yoon government has signaled this is the first budget in its plans for fiscal retrenchment, which will scale back the previous Moon government\u2019s projections for government debt growth and <\/span>stabilize<\/span><\/a> the debt burden at around 50% of GDP.<\/span><\/p>\n South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol has lunch with soldiers working during the Chuseok holiday in Seoul on Sept. 10, 2022 | Image: Office of the 20th President<\/a><\/p><\/div>\n MAJOR BUDGET ITEMS<\/b><\/p>\n Consumer price inflation currently stands at over 6%, and when accounted for, South Korea is cutting every major line item in the budget this year. Some government procurement price inflation will probably be closer to producer price inflation, which is far <\/span>higher<\/span><\/a>, and this would mean even larger cuts.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n A major part of the new budget is the raising of tax deductions for households and firms, which will <\/span>raise<\/span><\/a> deductions by 10% on the previous year. Revenue will still increase, as the size of the economy continues to grow. The deductions were raised to deal with the problem of <\/span>bracket creep<\/span><\/a>, with South Korean tax brackets not automatically <\/span>adjusting<\/span><\/a> for inflation (deductions remained the same for 15 years even as consumer prices rose 35% over that period).\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Additional changes to rates would require further primary legislation, and slated plans to cut corporation tax rates are apparently <\/span>unpopular<\/span><\/a> with the opposition party, which is also the majority party in the National Assembly.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Aside from revenue, the budget also makes a number of substantive changes to spending on significant line items.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n These include a 4.6% increase in the defense budget, with much of the increase in spending going on raises in the salaries and benefits of enlisted soldiers (combined salary and benefits from 820,000 won a month to 1.3 million won). Inflation may mean a real-term cut in defense procurement budgets, as it does <\/span>elsewhere<\/span><\/a>.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Alongside defense, the Yoon government plans a 4.1% increase in welfare spending. This mainly involves broadening the scope and size of welfare payments to the needy, the disabled and the old. In particular, direct payments and health care support are set to rise, though here again it is unclear what the overall impact of inflation might be, especially on direct payments given the number of beneficiaries in an aging society.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n With respect to industry, the Yoon government has decided to prioritize environmental (3.9%) and R&D (3.0%) budgets, with a particular interest in climate change-related funding. Conversely, it is making significant cuts to infrastructure investment (SOC) and other industrial projects.<\/span><\/p>\n Some of these cuts relate to temporary COVID-relief programs. And a sizable portion involves scaling back existing programs aimed at improving the urban landscape and handing over SOC-related projects to regional governments. There will also be less investment in rail, roads and industrial parks and logistics, as well as port facilities (detailed information available <\/span>here<\/span><\/a>). The overall impact is likely to depress investment and may also hurt regional government balance sheets.<\/span><\/p>\n The big takeaway from next year\u2019s budget is that it includes a range of cuts that will help to stabilize the country\u2019s medium-term fiscal position, but it will also involve pain for industry, likely cuts to military investment and may do less to help the poor and needy than headline figures imply. It will also bring some tax relief to voters, though this help will be concentrated in upper-income households and larger firms.<\/span><\/p>\n Edited by Arius Derr<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n\n